ShareThis Page
New novel by Rebecca Drake tests the bonds of friendship |

New novel by Rebecca Drake tests the bonds of friendship

| Friday, January 5, 2018 8:57 p.m
Tribune-Review File
Rebecca Drake, author of 'Only Ever You' and “Just Between Friends” is photographed in Mystery Lovers Bookshop in Oakmont on Thursday, March 10, 2016.

The idea for Rebecca Drake’s new novel, “Just Between Friends” (St. Martin’s Griffin), came from a conversation she had with a friend: If someone they knew committed a crime, would they offer protection or contact the authorities?

“How far would I go to help a friend? How loyal would I be?” asks Drake, who appears Jan. 11 at Penguin Bookshop in Sewickley and Jan. 18 at Riverstone Books in McCandless.

“To me, the questions that are provoked by this book are how far would you go to help a friend and how much do you really know about another person’s marriage.”

In “Just Between Friends,” those questions are put to four women who have bonded over their school-age children in Sewickley. Sarah, Julie, Alison and Heather share coffee and wine, talk about their kids and gossip about other mothers. When Heather starts showing bruises, her friends immediately suspect she’s being abused by her husband, a successful surgeon and minor Pittsburgh celebrity.

That the book is being published as the #metoo movement crests is a “happy accident,” says Drake, who lives in the Fox Chapel area and teaches writing in the MFA program at Seton Hill University in Greensburg. But she knows victims of domestic violence and helped a friend leave an abusive relationship, and researched similar situations for the book.

“It’s so hard to convince somebody to leave a relationship,” Drake says. “It’s really difficult. When you’re on the outside you can be very frustrated by that. Why won’t they leave, why do they stay? But sometimes, like Heather, people feel like they don’t have options.”

The novel turns when the women are called to Heather’s home late one night and discover a crime scene – to say anymore would ruin the book’s surprise – and are faced with a decision that changes their lives in unforeseen ways. The group that bonded over shared concerns of raising children starts to fray and react differently in tandem over how to proceed after witnessing the crime.

“One of the things I was interested in exploring was communication,” Drake says. “How we feed each other’s myths about one another, how we can feed emotions. One person alone might not do something, but if two or three people are there, then it can be a catalyst for action, and a catalyst for how invested they get into it.”

Drake tells the story through each of the main characters, alternating chapters in the first person. This device proved to be more challenging than the author thought it would be, but allowed Drake the freedom to explore multiple viewpoints.

She also purposely set the novel in Sewickley —­ her previous novel, “Only Ever You,” was set in Fox Chapel — because of a longstanding fear of smaller places.

“I’m a native New Yorker and so I’m a little more urban by nature, and I’m more frightened by suburban areas,” Drake says. “So I’m intrigued by this idea of how we think of the suburbs – and I live in a very nice suburb and Sewickley is a very nice suburban village, it’s very idyllic – that are on the surface beautiful. I think there are many communities like this that are very affluent and delightful and many people would love to live there. But there’s crime everywhere, and I’m more interested in that.”

Rege Behe is a Tribune-Review contributing writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.