ShareThis Page
New Omarosa book: Did she secretly tape Trump? |

New Omarosa book: Did she secretly tape Trump?

| Wednesday, August 8, 2018 10:09 p.m
Omarosa Manigault Newman has a memoir coming that her publisher calls “explosive” and “jaw-dropping.” The book is called “Unhinged.” Gallery Books announced that it will be released on Aug. 14. Manigault Newman was a Trump ally who joined his administration in January 2017 as a White House communications director.

Omarosa Manigault Newman may have been clueless about how to play nice at the White House but she’s proving to be skillful at promoting her “tell-all” book about her brief time there with leaked hints and allegations.

The latest semi-juicy tidbit about the forthcoming “Unhinged: An Insider’s Account of the Trump White House,” landed Wednesday in The Daily Beast , which reported that the flamboyant former reality-TV star secretly taped her conversations with President Trump on her smartphone.

Omarosa could not be reached for comment on whether or not this is true about the book, out on Aug. 14. But her publisher, Gallery Books, a division of Simon & Schuster, said in a statement to USA Today:

“Without commenting on the specific contents of “Unhinged,” we are confident that Omarosa Manigault Newman can substantiate her highly-anticipated account of life inside the Trump White House.”

So maybe there are tapes and maybe not. But in any case, these alleged recorded conversations were about…well, not much of anything, apparently. Just “anodyne, everyday chatter” between Omarosa and Trump, her one-time mentor and boss on “The Apprentice” and the man to whom she pledged undying loyalty.

“The mere existence of such recordings represent a dramatic betrayal of trust by a one-time Trump confidant who has since abandoned years of professed loyalty to the president and has apparently decided to profit off her years of closeness to Trump,” The Daily Beast sniffed.

The president has already demonstrated he’s not a fan of being secretly recorded — as his ex-attorney Michael Cohen learned when Trump found out Cohen had secretly taped his former client. (“What kind of a lawyer would tape a client?” Trump tweeted angrily.)

But the longtime mutual admiration between Trump and Omarosa evaporated for good in December, when she was terminated and escorted from the White House complex following a turbulent year when she was a presidential assistant who clashed with people she shouldn’t have clashed with.

Almost immediately (well, after a stint on “Celebrity Big Brother” ) Omarosa started hinting ominously in public about what she saw in the White House and how she could produce a blockbuster book about the “uncomfortable” and “upsetting” things that happened.

“When I have the chance to tell my story, it’s quite a story to tell,” she said on “Good Morning America” shortly after her departure was announced. “ As the only African American in this White House… I have seen things that made me uncomfortable, upset me… and affected my community and my people.”

Once the book was announced, Gallery Books began promoting it as an “explosive, jaw-dropping account” of her time with the Trump campaign and administration. She seemingly began baiting Trump, adding the hashtag: “#ComeClean45” to a tweet advertising the Amazon page for the book.

Then last week Britain’s The Daily Mail reported Omarosa claims in the book to know what was going on in Trump’s brain during her tenure in the White House – and it wasn’t good.

While watching an interview Trump gave, Omarosa “realized that something real and serious was going on in Donald’s brain,” according to an excerpt the Mail obtained by means it did not explain.

“His mental decline could not be denied. Many didn’t notice it as keenly as I did because I knew him way back when. They thought Trump was being Trump, off the cuff. But I knew something wasn’t right.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.