Monroeville author tells Pirates’ stories ‘By the Numbers’ |

Monroeville author tells Pirates’ stories ‘By the Numbers’

Lillian DeDomenic | For The Tribune-Review
Author David Finoli's recently published book, 'Pirates by the Numbers,” recounts the history of the Pittsburgh Pirates by uniform numbers.
Lillian DeDomenic | For The Tribune-Review
Local author David Finoli checks his recently published book, 'Pirates by the Numbers,” whih recounts the history of the Pittsburgh Pirates by uniform numbers.
Lillian DeDomenic | For The Tribune-Review
Baseball historian David Finoli gave a presentation about the greatest players and games in the history of Pittsburgh Pirates baseball at the Monroeville Public Library on Tuesday, May 10, 2016. Finoli is the author of 'Pirates by the Numbers: A Complete Team History of the Bucs by Uniform Number,' his latest book among many.

Just about everything you could want to know about a baseball player’s performance can be quantified and measured.

FIP, WHIP, LIPS, VORP, BsR, wRC+, wOBA — take your pick. All are acronyms for advanced statistics used to evaluate today’s players.

But the numbers Pittsburgh author and Pirates historian David Finoli of Monroeville appreciates the most can simply be found on the backs of players.

In his latest book, “Pirates By the Numbers: A Complete Team History of the Bucs by Uniform Number,” Finoli chronicles each player to wear the franchise’s 81 jersey numbers — from Junior Ortiz at 0 to Joe Beimel at 97.

Finoli, who has written 20 sports books, including “The Pittsburgh Pirates Encyclopedia,” says this book, released in April, was an opportunity for him to tell lesser-known tales of Pirates history by highlighting the best, worst and most interesting players to sport each number.

“I thought this could be a neat way to tell the Pirates’ story and maybe some of the players who you don’t read as much about,” Finoli says. “It’s probably been the most fun I’ve had doing a book.”

Baseball teams began placing numbers on their jerseys in 1929, when the New York Yankees assigned each player a number that corresponded with his position in the batting order. Babe Ruth, for example, wore No. 3 because he batted third in the order in front of Lou Gehrig, who wore No. 4.

When the Pirates introduced uniform numbers three years later, the announcement was deemed so insignificant that it became upstaged by the franchise’s first “ladies day” at the ballpark.

Since that time, uniform numbers have taken on more cultural significance.

“As a kid, when you pick your number for Little League or anything, you do it to identify one of your heroes,” Finoli says.

In Pittsburgh, most associate 21 with the revered Roberto Clemente. But there’s often more significance to a number than many fans realize, Finoli says.

Clemente was not the only Hall of Famer to wear 21 for the Pirates. Shortstop Arky Vaughan, who went to nine consecutive All-Star games from 1934 to 1942, also wore the number. Like Clemente, Vaughan died a premature death while trying to help others when he attempted to save a friend after his fishing boat capsized, Finoli says.

The book is available at bookstores and online.

Matthew Zabierek is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-320-7893 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.