Pitt professor’s ‘Dead Boys’ addresses impact of violence |

Pitt professor’s ‘Dead Boys’ addresses impact of violence

Heather Kresge
Adriana E. Ramirez

In her first collection of essays, Adriana E. Ramirez writes about a topic that makes many people uncomfortable. “Dead Boys” concerns those who have died “too young, too soon,” in Pittsburgh and, especially, near the U.S.-Mexican border where she lived at one time.

She admits it’s not the stuff of a pleasant summer read.

“Not everyone has an inherent fascination with the dead,” Ramirez says.

“Dead Boys” recently won the first PEN/Fusion Prize, awarded to a writer younger than 35 for an unpublished work of nonfiction addressing a global or multicultural issue. The award includes a $10,000 cash prize.

Angie Cruz, an assistant professor of English at the University of Pittsburgh who taught Ramirez, is not surprised her former student won.

“I am thrilled Adriana’s work has finally received the attention it deserves,” Cruz says. “Her nonfiction is about an invisible America, that is both personal and political, both tender but terrifying. She makes it clear to us all that everyone is impacted by violence both here and abroad, and we must pay attention.”

Ramirez teaches in the English department at Pitt and has an extensive background in poetry. In 2006, Individual World Poetry Slam ranked her as the No. 26 slam poet in the world. While attending Rice University in Houston, where she earned a bachelor of arts degree in English, she started to become interested in nonfiction because there were stories to tell.

“Poetry is a lot more fun,” she says. “Poetry is my hobby writing, and nonfiction is my job.”

The second chapter in the book, “La Frontera” is about nine people who were found hanged on a pedestrian bridge in Nuevo Laredo, Mexico, on May 4, 2012, near where Ramirez used to live. She had crossed the bridge many times and was stunned by the impersonality of the news.

“At first, they didn’t publish the names,” Ramirez says. “They were just nine bodies. But they were people. I tried to figure out who they were or try to understand them, and I couldn’t find any information. I started thinking there are so many bodies that wash ashore or are in conflict. There were 14 heads found in coolers (the same day). It’s just an incredibly violent situation, and we find greater disconnect from it by just reading numbers in the news. I tried to do my best to tell the story.”

Ramirez admits she and her friends sometimes became immune to the violence that was nearby. They’d worry more about going shopping or to clubs than the loss of life.

That loss of life, however, also became cliched.

“After people die, we tend to make them into saints,” Ramirez says. “Or we make them perfect, or we just make them victims of a tragedy instead of being human beings with agency. I think we are desensitized to violence, but also that we deify the dead, as well.”

Ramirez admits that being “upbeat and a bit gregarious” sometimes obscures that she approached the stories in “Dead Boys” with utmost seriousness.

But she cannot deny her nature.

“It’s also very Colombian,” she says, noting her Mexican-Colombian heritage. “Colombian people are happy people, but their county has been at civil war for 60 years. But the music is happy, and death makes the stakes of living a little higher. Everyone kind of takes carpe diem to heart. Life is too short to be miserable, and it’s also a way that we cope. We cope with sadness and how hard and difficult all of this can be by sort of making a promise to the gods to do our best to live with it.”

Rege Behe is a contributing writer for Trib Total Media.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.