Review: Writing is sharp and precise in Chris Knopf’s ‘Cop Job’ |

Review: Writing is sharp and precise in Chris Knopf’s ‘Cop Job’

This book cover image released by The Permanent Press shows 'Cop Job,' by Chris Knopf. (The Permanent Press via AP)

The Hamptons, a group of hamlets on Long Island’s south fork, is one of America’s most opulent summer colonies — one that is gradually crowding out what is left of the fishing villages and workmen’s cottages that at one time dotted the shoreline. Sam Acquillo, a former pro boxer turned cabinetmaker, stands astride these worlds, not always entirely comfortable in either.

This makes him well-positioned to pursue his hobby — sticking his nose into police investigations. In the past, Sam’s meddling has not been welcomed by the local authorities. In fact, the district attorney’s office has tried to bring criminal charges against him. But in “Cop Job,” the sixth novel in this series, the police chief and prosecutor invite Sam to investigate the murder of a disabled war veteran.

At first, Sam wonders why, but it doesn’t take him long to figure out that the victim was a police informer, that two other “snitches” had recently turned up dead and that officials fear an insider might have leaked their names to local drug smugglers.

As Sam tries to piece the case together, he is threatened, someone close to him is attacked, and he and his sidekick, attorney Jackie Swaitkowski, find themselves with a hoard of colorful suspects. The case is so puzzling that it seems Sam may never get to the bottom of it. But of course he does, wrapping everything up with a slam-bang action finish.

As always with a Chris Knopf novel, the writing is as sharp and precise as Sam’s wood chisels, making “Cop Job” a worthy entry in this entertaining series.

Bruce DeSilva, winner of the Mystery Writers of America’s Edgar Award, is the author of four crime novels including “A Scourge of Vipers.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.