‘Stalin’s Daughter’: The extraordinary life of a Soviet defector |

‘Stalin’s Daughter’: The extraordinary life of a Soviet defector


“Wherever I go, whether to Australia or some island, I will always be the political prisoner of my father’s name.” Such was the lament of Svetlana Alliluyeva, whose life sentence it was to be the only daughter of Joseph Stalin.

Born in 1926, she grew up with enormous privileges. Some called her the Princess of the Kremlin; there was even a perfume, Breath of Svetlana, named after her. To Stalin, she was his “little sparrow.” Lavrenty Beria, the notorious head of the secret police, bounced her on his knee, and she, in turn, playfully bossed around Stalin’s henchmen.

But grimness lurked all around as the dictator signed death warrants and consigned millions to the gulag. Even her own relatives were not immune: Uncles, aunts and cousins were executed or imprisoned. Her mother committed suicide in 1932 (an event still shrouded in some mystery; did she kill herself as a protest?) and a teenage crush was sent off to prison camp.

Svetlana would spend a lifetime coming to terms with the cruelties wrought in her father’s name. Her defection to the West in 1967 made her a Cold War celebrity with a sinister pedigree; she could never quite escape the sobriquet “Stalin’s daughter.” “You can’t live your own life. You can’t live any life. You exist only in reference to a name,” she mused.

In her poignant biography, Canadian writer Rosemary Sullivan tells Svetlana’s story with sympathy and sharp psychological insight. Sullivan does not cast Svetlana’s life as an unmitigated tragedy or as a treacly triumph against the odds.

There were, certainly, many setbacks, financial and emotional. She left two children behind in the Soviet Union; she was a compulsive mover, always in search of the next best place, even if she could never find it. She endured three divorces and several broken relationships. She struggled in the West — when she arrived, she had no idea how to balance a checkbook — and could never let go of her homeland. She returned, briefly, to the Soviet Union in the 1980s.

But this proud, stubborn, sincere, volatile, polarizing woman, blessed with a sharp intellect and literary gifts, was propelled by a rare life force. “She had an undaunted optimism, honed by years of surviving so many cruel bereavements, so many disappointments and losses,” Sullivan observes. “Somehow she continued to believe in the future.”

Svetlana’s story made her a hot property, and she signed a book contract that earned her millions. But such a windfall made her a target. She found herself mixed up with Frank Lloyd Wright’s widow, who ran a cultlike fellowship of the architect’s disciples. A marriage to one of them, Wes Peters, ended in shambles and financial distress (she gave huge sums to her chronically indebted husband).

“Stalin’s Daughter” soars on details culled from dozens of interviews and archival research from KGB and CIA files. The glimpses into the Stalin household are invariably fascinating, and the subsequent wanderings of Svetlana as she searches for inner peace take on an epic quality.

George F. Kennan, the Cold War diplomat, who took in Svetlana on her arrival in the States, called her journey an “incomprehensible Odyssey.” It is to Sullivan’s credit that she makes the Homeric wanderings of Svetlana Alliluyeva — who died, almost penniless, in 2011 — not only comprehensible, but also unforgettably moving.

Matthew Price is a staff writer for Newsday.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.