ShareThis Page
Gretchen Carlson under new fire for ‘reckless’ Miss America statements |
Celebrity News

Gretchen Carlson under new fire for ‘reckless’ Miss America statements

Andy Kropa/Invision/AP
Gretchen Carlson participates in the BUILD Speaker Series to discuss her book ‘Be Fierce: Stop Harassment and Take Back Your Power’ at AOL Studios, in New York.

The turmoil engulfing the nearly century-old Miss America pageant intensified Monday as CEO Gretchen Carlson came under new fire for a statement blaming the reigning Miss America for the loss of $75,000 in scholarship money.

“More reckless speech on behalf of the Miss America Organization,” actor, activist and Miss America 1998 Kate Shindle tweeted early Monday. “The board members are clearly unable to control their chair. Time for a change.”

Shindle was reacting to a statement released by Carlson through her personal Twitter account Sunday night in which she denied accusations of bullying from current Miss America Cara Mund and said Mund has refused to speak to her except through email. Carlson initially tweeted out the statement in a dozen separate numbered tweets, but deleted those and left up only a screen shot of the statement in full.

“Pro tip: maybe check in with your PR team on this,” Shindle added.

Mund’s accusations, released in a five-page letter addressed to a group of former Miss America winners who are calling for Carlson’s ouster, have plunged the iconic Atlantic City institution into further disarray less than three weeks before the pageant is scheduled to take place in Boardwalk Hall and be televised on ABC.

Carlson, a former Fox News broadcaster and Miss America 1989 who has spoken out against workplace harassment against women, took over the organization after an email scandal ousted the former leadership. She eliminated the swimsuit competition, upsetting many in the state pageant system, and said the pageant would be remade as a competition to fill the “job” of Miss America.

But Mund, a graduate of Brown University who was Miss North Dakota, now says the reality of that job fits the description of workplace bullying and harassment under New Jersey law.

In Carlson’s statement, she said she was “surprised and saddened beyond words” by Mund’s letter, but wished Mund had reached out to her directly. She said her attempts to reach Mund via phone, text and email have been rebuffed.

“Unfortunately, Cara’s response has been that she only wants to communicate via email, but I remain hopeful we can speak on the phone or in person soon,” Carlson wrote.

In denying that she bullied Mund, Carlson added that she has acknowledged “to you and your parents many times, that the organization understands the frustrations of serving during such a change-filled and stressful year.”

Carlson then went on to write; “Actions have consequences,” and said a sponsor had pulled the plug on $75,000 in scholarships, “which would have been the first scholarship increase in years.”

She said the money was “no longer on the table as a direct result of the explosive allegations in your letter,” a charge that angered many in the organization, who took to Twitter and elsewhere and said they interpreted that as unfairly blaming Mund and continuing the pattern of belittling her.

“The impact won’t stop there,” Carlson wrote. “We are already seeing a negative ripple effect across the entire organization, and I am so concerned that it will dilute the experience for the next woman selected to wear the crown.”

Miss America spokesman Karl Nilsson said in an email Monday morning that the loss of scholarship money referenced by Carlson “was not outlined or defined.”

“This news is severely damaging the organization and is having an impact on securing future sponsorships,” he said.

Ironically, the vulgar emails that undid the previous leadership were mostly about former Miss Americas complaining about the organization. Current Miss America executive director Regina Hopper has said she was instrumental in leaking the emails.

But now Carlson and Hopper are fighting a chorus of calls for them to step down themselves. Two of the former Miss Americas calling for new regime change, Heather Whitestone and Suzette Charles, appeared on NBC’s Megyn Kelly Today on Monday morning and called for their resignations. Charles, who was appointed to be the Atlantic City liaison, said the only community activity approved during pageant week was a Gretchen Carlson leadership seminar.

The Miss America Organization is in the final year of a three-year $12 million subsidy from the New Jersey Casino Reinvestment Development Authority.

ABC, which has given Carlson previous airtime to discuss the elimination of the swimsuit competition and other changes to Miss America, featured an interview Monday morning with Caressa Cameron-Jackson, Miss America 2010, calling for Carlson’s ouster. “We are not going to do the victim shaming here,” Cameron-Jackson said on Good Morning America.

“Oh Gretchen,” tweeted Jennifer Vaden Barth, Miss North Carolina 1991 and a regional education program manager for Google. “There are no words for what you have done here. Shocking and outrageous. This is not how leaders act.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.