Kennywood, Idlewild earn fan favorite Golden Ticket awards |
More A&E

Kennywood, Idlewild earn fan favorite Golden Ticket awards

Shirley McMarlin
Robie Capps Photography
Idlewild and SoakZone in Ligonier Township was named Best Children's Park at the 2018 Golden Ticket Awards ceremony held Sept. 8 in Branson, Mo.
Tribune-Review file
Kennywood's classic Noah's Ark was named Best Funhouse/Walk-Through Attraction at the Sept. 8 Golden Ticket Awards in Branson, Mo. The awards for 'best of the best' in the amusement industry are calculated from an international poll by Amusement Today.

Kennywood Park and Idlewild & SoakZone are again ranked among the “best of the best” in the amusement industry, garnering top spots at the Golden Ticket Awards held Sept. 8 in Branson, Mo.

Kennywood’s Noah’s Ark attraction was recognized for the ninth straight year as the world’s best Funhouse/Walk-through Attraction, while Idlewild topped the competition as Best Children’s Park, also for the ninth year running.

The international Golden Ticket Awards are voted on by a panel of theme park aficionados and compiled by industry publication Amusement Today.

“Even with big changes happening at Kennywood in 2018, rare and historic rides like Noah’s Ark are critical to our identity,” says Kennywood General Manager Jerome Gibas. “It’s rewarding to see the hard work of our team pay off with recognition from Golden Ticket Awards voters.”

“Noah’s Ark is just a delight,” says Tim Baldwin, Golden Ticket Awards communications coordinator for Amusement Today. “Kennywood has so many of those old-time, generational attractions that you have to visit when you go there, like the Potato Patch, Thunderbolt, the Jack Rabbit and Noah’s Ark.”

Noah’s Ark took 34 percent of votes in its category. Sixteen percent of voters preferred Idlewild over runners-up Morgan’s Wonderland in San Antonio, Texas (11 percent), and fellow Pennsylvania park, Sesame Place in Langhorne, Bucks County (10 percent).

“Idlewild & SoakZone provides fairy tales, fun rides and Daniel Tiger from Mr. Rogers’ Neighborhood in a day filled with family fun,” according to Amusement Today.

“It’s just a fantastic setting and so welcoming,” Baldwin says about Idlewild. “Picnics in the pavilions, it’s shady. It brings the atmosphere along with the rides. It really is one of a kind.”

Kennywood roller coasters also were fan favorites, with Phantom’s Revenge ranking No. 13 among steel coasters. Thunderbolt came in at No. 15 among wooden coasters and Jack Rabbit took the No. 20 spot.

The West Mifflin park’s Phantom Fright Nights ranked fifth in the Top 5 Best Halloween events in the amusement and theme park world. The Pittsburgh Halloween tradition will begin its 17th season on Sept. 28.

Both parks conclude their summer operating seasons on Sept. 16, with Idlewild’s Hallowboo event for children beginning Sept. 29.

Amusement Today gathers its voting panel from amusement park enthusiasts who visit several parks each year.

“To help keep things balanced, an equal number is divided among four geographical regions of the U.S., and an international segment is also represented,” the website says. The common thread is to find the most experienced, well-traveled park fans out there.”

Park employees and manufacturer representatives are not eligible to vote.

Amusement park lovers who would like to be considered for next year’s panel can email [email protected]

Shirley McMarlin is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 724-836-5750, [email protected] or via Twitter @shirley_trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.