ShareThis Page
Relaunching ‘Yellow Submarine’: Beatles-inspired classic out in restored version |

Relaunching ‘Yellow Submarine’: Beatles-inspired classic out in restored version

| Monday, June 11, 2012 10:47 p.m

When the Beatles-inspired “Yellow Submarine” was released in 1968, its promoters linked it to classic myths and landmark tales of fantastic voyages such as the “Odyssey” and “Alice in Wonderland.” In the intervening decades, the iconic movie has inspired waves of analysis and dreamy philosophizing: Who do the Blue Meanies represent? What does the voyage of the Yellow Submarine symbolize? What drugs were the animators taking?

But “Yellow Submarine” is also simply what it seems — a free-spirited, creative effort by hundreds of people that expresses the joyful, humane spirit of the Beatles’ music. The film, which has been out of print for years, was re-released last week on DVD and Blu-ray in a meticulously hand-restored version.

Animation director Robert Balser, now 85, says “Yellow Submarine” was the result of an uninhibited creative effort that was improbable at the time and would be impossible in today’s corporate entertainment world. (He swears his team was fueled by nothing more than whiskey and imagination.)

“No matter what money you had, you could never get the freedom we had,” Balser says.

The movie tells the story of Pepperland, an “unearthly paradise” that’s invaded by the Blue Meanies, monsters led by a bulbous and sinister falsetto-voiced chief. They turn Pepperland’s people into petrified gray statues and crush all joy and music.

One Pepperlander escapes in the title vehicle to England (a drab place rather like his ruined home) and convinces the Beatles to help. They voyage through a wondrous ocean, where they travel back and forth in time, encounter impossible monsters and meet the Nowhere Man. Together they bring music and life back to Pepperland, even winning over the Meanies. The film ends in a triumphant explosion of color and motion set to “All You Need is Love.”

When Balser and a group that would swell to 40 writers and 200 artists began gathering in London’s tiny TVC animation studios in the summer of 1967, they had no script, only a vague directive to work off the Beatles’ songs.

The band, at the height of its popularity, wanted nothing to do with the movie.

The group hated a Beatles cartoon series that TVC and King Features (which produced “Yellow Submarine”) had done for American television, and signed off on the film only to fulfill a contractual obligation. Actors voiced their parts. The Beatles contributed four new songs, but stayed away from the studios until “Submarine” was nearly finished, when they dropped in to film a promo for the movie’s ending.

“When I came onto the film on the first day I said, ‘OK, what do we do?’ ” Balser recalls.

“They didn’t know what to do. I said at least we know we have to use the songs and take a trip on a Yellow Submarine.”

Czechoslovakian artist Heinz Edelman came up with the Blue Meanies and the idea of good battling evil. The writers included Yale classics professor Erich Segal, who would go on to write the blockbuster pop novel “Love Story,” and an uncredited young unknown named Roger McGough, who would become one of England’s most celebrated poets.

They helped produce a movie full of erudite jokes and classical references — as Pepperland explodes, the Chief Blue Meanie chortles, “I haven’t laughed so much since Pompeii,” and a four-headed dog seems modeled on Cerberus, who guards the entrance to Hades.

They produced an unwieldy amount of material as they experimented, Balser says, including nearly an hour of animation for “Lucy in the Sky With Diamonds,” a sequence of just a few minutes.

Students swelled the team (“We emptied out the art schools of London to work all night painting animation cels”) as they worked frantically to finish in 11 months — a breakneck pace for an animated film, particularly in a pre-computer era when everything was done by hand.

“It was really by the seat of the pants,” says Balser, whose credits include an animated TV series based on the Jackson 5 and an Emmy-winning film of “The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe.”

“The final script was typed up a week before the premiere. It’s not a way to make a film. And whenever I’ve given lectures and seminars to talk about film planning, I make that damn clear. The fact it worked was one in a million.”

But it did work. And the vivid colors, the wildly morphing shapes, the visual expression of mind-bending concepts (the vacuum-mouthed monster that sucks up the world; the dimension-folding Sea of Holes) and the exuberant message of freedom and nonconformity made “Yellow Submarine” unlike any film before or since.

Yet, the film’s creators weren’t aiming to create an icon — only to unleash their imaginations and make something original.

“We didn’t say we’re going to do this because of this or that — it just happened,” Balser says. “I see how it works with little kids, with teenagers, how it’s engraved in the memory of older people. I think it resonates today, but I don’t know why.”

When Balser saw his handiwork years after finishing it, he noticed many things he could have done better.

But he also saw that the mistakes didn’t matter.

“I thought, ‘This is a real fun film.’ That’s the thing I think will keep it going for a long time. It’s a really, really fun film.”

Jordan Levin is a staff writer for The Miami Herald.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.