Alex Trebek mocks ‘Jeopardy!’ contestants who know nothing about football |

Alex Trebek mocks ‘Jeopardy!’ contestants who know nothing about football

Matt Rosenberg

Take it easy, Trebek. Not everyone is a football junkie.

“Jeopardy!” host Alex Trebek pulled no punches when contestants on Thursday night’s episode of the quiz show had no clue about football.

None of the three contestants buzzed in to even attempt to answer the series of five questions in the category “Talkin’ Football.” It became painfully obvious they didn’t know anything about football.

“I can tell you guys are big football fans,” Trebek said sarcastically after no one buzzed in with the correct question on the first answer.

After no one knew “Who are the Dallas Cowboys?” was question to the second answer in the category — “Tom Landry perfected the shotgun formation with this team” — Trebek asked the contestants: “Do you think we should go to commercial?”

But there was still time before the round ended, so Trebek humored the audience — and likely himself more than anyone — by finishing up the category while the audience laughed at the lack of knowledge at the podiums.

Among the other things the contestants would have need to know to get one of the questions right: Option, fair catch, offsetting penalties and Purple People Eaters.

“Let’s look at the $1,000 clue, just for the fun of it,” Trebek said. The clue was about the vaunted Vikings defensive line. When, predictably, no one had a clue, the show cut to commercial.

“We’re going to take a break. I have to talk to them.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.