Warhol Museum spins Stones exhibit around ‘Sticky Fingers’ cover |

Warhol Museum spins Stones exhibit around ‘Sticky Fingers’ cover

This CD cover image released by UMe shows 'Sticky Fingers', a 1971 release by the Rolling Stones being re-released in a deluxe edition.

A Grammy-nominated album cover designed by Andy Warhol is the heart of a display tied to an upcoming visit of the Rolling Stones.

Two tables of material looking at the cover of “Sticky Fingers” is on view at the Andy Warhol Museum on the North Side.

“This really gives us a chance to show off some material from our collection,” says Jessica Warchall, an assistant communications manager from the museum.

While the display was put together because of the June 20 concert at nearby Heinz Field, she says it will be up indefinitely.

The display features the front and back of the 1971 album with its famous zippered pair of blue jeans as well as the underwear-clad figure on the inside. Naturally, the display also includes the album sleeve with the tongue that has become something of a symbol of the Stones.

Also on exhibit are a promotional poster for the album, and correspondence on the 1972 Grammy nomination and its Art Directors Club of New York certificate of merit. With that material is a copy of a telegram from the Stones, sent by Atlantic Records to Warhol.

With the album material are 10 Polaroids and acetate photos of a jeans-clad body used in production of the cover.

Mick Jagger, perhaps?

“We have no idea who it might be,” Warchall says.

Bob Karlovits is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at [email protected] or 412-320-7852.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.