Bank of America fined for interest rate manipulation |
Business Briefs

Bank of America fined for interest rate manipulation


CHARLOTTE, N.C. — A federal regulator said Wednesday that it fined Bank of America $30 million to settle charges that it attempted to manipulate global interest rates and that it knowingly filed false reports in an alleged scheme that spanned six years.

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission said the charges brought against the Charlotte-based bank involved activities running from 2007 to 2012. Bank of America traders attempted to manipulate the U.S. Dollar International Swaps and Derivatives Association Fix, a benchmark used to set rates, to benefit the bank’s trading positions at the expense of other parties, the regulator said.

Bank of America spokesman Bill Halldin said the bank has enhanced its procedures to detect any inappropriate behavior. In its news release, the commission also said Bank of America has taken significant remedial action to strengthen its internal controls and policies.

According to the regulator, the bank’s traders would bid, offer and execute transactions around 11 a.m. with the intent to affect rates before they were published. Traders would direct other Bank of America employees to submit false reports to further manipulate rates, the regulator said.

Other firms have been fined over charges of attempted manipulation of the same benchmark.

On Tuesday, the commission said it fined Intercapital Capital Markets $50 million. In August, it fined BNP Paribas Securities Corp. $90 million.

JPMorgan Chase and Deutsche Bank Securities are among other banks fined.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.