Southwestern Pennsylvania manufacturers cite applicants’ lack of basic skills in survey |
Business Briefs

Southwestern Pennsylvania manufacturers cite applicants’ lack of basic skills in survey

Stephen Huba

A majority of Southwestern Pennsylvania businesses responding to an ongoing Catalyst Connection survey say “basic employability skills” are the No. 1 deficiency of job applicants.

About 54 percent of the businesses that have responded to the Manufacturing Employment Demand Study ranked skills such as attendance, timeliness and work ethic as the chief things lacking in applicants.

The study, funded by the Richard King Mellon Foundation, seeks to better understand the current and projected demand for workers in the manufacturing sector, said Petra Mitchell, Catalyst Connection president and CEO.

The study will look at the number of workers needed and the skill sets required, with a view toward developing an apprenticeship program for high-demand occupations, Mitchell said.

Other findings from the survey so far include:

• About 22 percent of manufacturers have five to 10 entry-level production jobs that have been open longer than 30 days.

• For about 45 percent of manufacturers, the unfilled positions have had a significant impact on employee and customer satisfaction, production costs, on-time delivery, and sales and employment growth.

• Because of the skilled worker shortage, about 38 percent of the respondents said they are likely to outsource products and business or lose a customer.

The survey takes about 18 minutes to complete and can be accessed online .

Stephen Huba is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-850-1280, [email protected] or via Twitter @shuba_trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.