7,000 fewer acres in Pennsylvania sit atop mines |
Local Stories

7,000 fewer acres in Pennsylvania sit atop mines

A shift in coal industry dynamics, with more efficient operations and mine relocation, has resulted in less land sitting atop mines in the state.

A new report released Tuesday by the Department of Environmental Protection said there has been an 18 percent decline in the amount of acreage located on top of mines. In 2013, 31,234 acres of land in Pennsylvania sat atop mines, according to the report, down from 38,256 acres five years ago.

Researchers say the decline reflects a reduced demand for coal and extension of Consol Energy Inc.’s Bailey Mine into parts of West Virginia. But John Pippy, CEO of the Pennsylvania Coal Alliance, says there are multiple factors at play aside from market conditions.

At some mines, “once that area is mined out, then (it) shifts to a different operation,” Pippy said. “Our operators are becoming more and more efficient. They’re capturing more from the seams and the sites. It’s a mixture of all things.”

Forty-six mines operated over the latest reporting period, from 2008 to 2013, down from 50 in the 2003 to 2008 report.

The report examined underground bituminous coal mines and the land and water above them. It is the fourth in a series of reports mandated by Act 54, which requires the state to monitor mine subsidence and hold mining companies responsible for damage to water supplies.

The report was released by the Department of Environmental Protection and was conducted by researchers at the University of Pittsburgh. Pitt researchers could not be reached for comment.

The report also found that a procedure to level the land, known as gate cutting, has been successful in reducing pooling and improving the quality of streams.

Gate cutting may improve some aspects of a stream, but it often does not account for the full impact of mining, nor prevent damage, said Patrick Grenter, executive director of the Center for Coalfield Justice, an environmental advocacy group based in Washington, Pa.

“Longwell mining is so destructive, and it is so damaging to the environment that there is no return to pre-mine status,” he said.

There were 1,250 reported incidents of damage to water supplies and structures such as houses, barns or silos during the five-year period, according to the report.

The report advised DEP to improve its data collection and maintenance system to better measure the effects of bituminous mines. The agency says it’s working to improve.

“DEP sees this as an opportunity for growth and has already begun to make changes to its primary database, the Bituminous Underground Mine Information System (BUMIS). Other data collection and management upgrades are being considered in order to continue to improve in this area,” Amanda Witman, a spokeswoman for the agency, wrote in an email.

Katelyn Ferral is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-380-5627 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.