ShareThis Page
EPA says greenhouse gas releases from wells, pipelines decline |
Local Stories

EPA says greenhouse gas releases from wells, pipelines decline

| Tuesday, September 30, 2014 10:33 p.m.
File photo of part of the MarkWest Houston 1, 2, and 3 Complex in Washington County. The plant processes natural gas coming from nearby Marcellus wells.

The U.S. oil and gas sector reduced greenhouse gas emissions from well sites, pipelines and processing facilities last year despite the industry’s continued growth, the Environmental Protection Agency said Tuesday.

Use of technology and improvements in hydraulic fracturing techniques in natural gas production led the way, accounting for a 73 percent decrease in methane released by that process since 2011, the EPA said.

The industry as a whole reduced methane emissions by 12 percent in two years, even as the number of sources reported to the government grew by 13 percent. Carbon dioxide emissions from the industry increased by 2.5 percent last year, but the methane reduction brought the overall number down by 1 percent.

The methane numbers continue a five-year trend in reductions that the EPA expects to continue with implementation of a 2012 rule requiring “green completions” of wells. Drillers must capture gas stored in flowback — the liquids that return to the surface during drilling and fracking — which prevents its release into the air.

“These data reflect our industry’s deep commitment to operational best practices aimed at ensuring that shale is produced safely and in a way that protects our environment,” said Travis Windle, spokesman for the North Fayette-based Marcellus Shale Coalition. “We’re also squarely focused on continuous technological advancements across all of our operations, including utilizing green completions as well as leak detection practices, to further enhance air quality.”

Environmental groups have pressured the industry to cut emissions from leaky pipelines, flaring at processing facilities and equipment at drill sites.

“Today’s newly-released data provide a critical tool in America’s effort to reduce climate pollution,” said Peter Zalzal, a staff attorney at the Environmental Defense Fund. “The data show why we need to swiftly deploy meaningful solutions, like EPA’s proposed Clean Power Plan, and why it’s urgent that we take additional actions to reduce methane emissions from the oil and gas sector.”

The 224 million metric tons of emissions from oil and gas systems represent the second-largest source of greenhouse gas, far behind power plants, which increased their emissions to more than 2 billion metric tons last year. The EPA blamed the jump on increased use of coal-fired plants.

The Obama administration and EPA have targeted greenhouse emissions for their effect on climate change, particularly coal-fired plants. A proposal to limit emissions has drawn sharp debate between environmentalists and those worried that forced retirements of coal plants will jeopardize the electric grid.

David Conti is a Trib Total Media staff writer. Reach him at 412-388-5802 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.