ShareThis Page
Foreclosures rise in the Pittsburgh area |
Local Stories

Foreclosures rise in the Pittsburgh area

| Monday, June 9, 2014 2:27 p.m

Foreclosure activity in the Pittsburgh region rose 16 percent last month, although housing experts doubt it is part of a long-term trend.

In the seven-county Pittsburgh region, there were 753 properties at some stage in the foreclosure process, 105 more than in April but 145 fewer than May 2013, according to data released on Tuesday by RealtyTrac. Pennsylvania had a monthly increase, but year-over-year decline. Meanwhile, the rest of the country averaged a 5 percent decline from the previous month and 26 percent decrease from a year ago.

The rise in foreclosures in Pittsburgh and the state appears to be a seasonal bump more than a fundamental shift in the market, said Daren Blomquist, vice president of RealtyTrac.

“The long-term trend both statewide and in Pittsburgh is down, with five consecutive months — including May — of year-over-year decreases in foreclosure activity,” Blomquist said. “The statewide foreclosure activity numbers were at the highest level since last May, however, so that is something to keep an eye on. If those continue to go higher in coming months, it could be evidence of a longer-term trend.”

The bump in May foreclosures was a surprise to Sonny Bringol, president of the Mortgage Bankers Association of Southwestern Pennsylvania.

“There’s nothing that indicates to me why it would have spiked,” said Bringol, who owns Victorian Finance in Bridgeville. “We have more pre-approvals than houses to sell.”

One of every 1,464 homes in the region was in foreclosure in May. Pennsylvania’s rate was higher, affecting one of every 1,001 homes, ranking the state 12th in the nation. The number of foreclosures increased about 30 percent in May but fell 4.37 percent from a year ago.

The state with the highest rate was Florida. North Dakota had the lowest rate.

Chris Fleisher is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.