ShareThis Page
Health care plan subscribers save with fewer choices of doctor, hospital, insurers say |
Local Stories

Health care plan subscribers save with fewer choices of doctor, hospital, insurers say

The government is taking steps to address complaints about health plans that aim to lower premiums in the Affordable Care Act marketplace by restricting patients’ choice of doctors and hospitals.

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services told insurers that it will review plans they intend to sell on Health in 2015 to ensure that they provide an adequate network of medical providers. The move could force insurers to expand provider choices for patients.

Across the country, some patients have been unable to get treatment from certain doctors and hospitals because of the prevalence of narrow-network health plans formed under the health reform law.

“These are important provisions and include requirements that insurers have adequate provider networks for consumers, including access to essential community providers that serve low-income, medically underserved individuals,” the agency said in its letter this week.

Management consulting firm Mc-Kinsey & Co. found that 70 percent of plans sold in 20 large urban markets used narrow networks.

Insurers are limiting choice to keep premiums low, said Karen Pollitz, an expert on insurance markets with the nonpartisan Kaiser Family Foundation in Menlo Park, Calif. But the strategy is catching some subscribers by surprise because “it’s not very transparent,” she said.

That’s the case in Western Pennsylvania, according to UPMC, the region’s largest network of hospitals and doctors. It claims popular narrow-network Community Blue plans from Highmark Inc., which exclude UPMC hospitals and doctors, are causing confusion among some patients.

“They’re showing up and they say, ‘We didn’t know that UPMC hospitals and doctors weren’t in the Community Blue network,’ ” UPMC spokesman Paul Wood said. “Several hundred” Community Blue subscribers have been turned away from UPMC doctors and hospitals this year, he said.

The state Insurance Department has received two consumer complaints about Community Blue since the beginning of the year, spokeswoman Melissa Fox said.

Of the more than 37,000 people who purchased Highmark coverage on as of Jan. 13, at least 80 percent bought Community Blue plans, the insurer has said. Community Blue plans also are sold to employer groups, but Highmark has not said how many members it has in those plans.

Titus North, a certified application counselor with the Squirrel Hill advocacy group Citizen Power, said it’s likely that consumers buying Community Blue plans on would be unaware that the plans exclude UPMC.

“It’s not clear when they’re signing up,” said North, who is certified by the federal government to help people sign up for coverage on “I find I have to really make it clear that these (Community Blue plans) don’t have access to UPMC facilities.”

Kristin Ash, a Highmark spokeswoman, said the insurer supplies a list of medical providers that are in-network to consumers who buy a Community Blue plan. Insurers are not required to tell consumers before they buy a plan which medical providers are in- or out-of-network.

“As far as I know, no health insurer touts who’s out-of-network in their marketing materials, as that wouldn’t be a good business practice,” Ash said. “UPMC Health Plan does not advertise that their members can’t use Allegheny Health Network.”

UPMC Health Plan has refused to tell the Tribune-Review which hospitals are excluded from its narrow-network plans.

Alex Nixon is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7928 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.