ShareThis Page
Murray Energy warns of up to 4,400 layoffs in September |
Local Stories

Murray Energy warns of up to 4,400 layoffs in September

Pittsburgh Tribune-Review
Miners listen to Mitt Romney as he speaks at a campaign stop on Tuesday, Aug. 14, 2012, at Murray Energy Corp.'s Century Mine in Beallsville, Ohio. Justin Merriman | Tribune-Review

Murray Energy Corp. is warning 4,400 of its 5,300 employees of potential layoffs in September as the coal company deals with a depressed market and a failed attempt at reaching a labor agreement with union miners.

Notices went out this week to employees in six states, in anticipation of what the St. Clairsville, Ohio-based company called “mass workforce reductions.” Its operations include five former Consol Energy mines in West Virginia that Murray purchased in 2013.

Like most coal companies, Murray has idled mines and furloughed workers over the past two years because of falling demand and prices as coal-fired power plants close or switch to natural gas.

“These workforce reductions are due to the ongoing destruction of the United States coal industry by President Barack Obama, and his supporters, and the increased utilization of natural gas to generate electricity,” the company said in a statement. It also said it would continue to produce and ship coal.

Members of the United Mine Workers of America this week rejected a proposed contract agreement with the Bituminous Coal Operators Association, which is led by company CEO Robert E. Murray. The current contract expires at the end of the year.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.