Archive

Oxford Development plans 33-story office tower Downtown | TribLIVE.com
Local Stories

Oxford Development plans 33-story office tower Downtown

oxfordtower
Rendering of proposed tower. Submitted

Oxford Development Co. said today it plans to build a 33-story office tower Downtown, or renovate the six-story building that’s already on the Smithfield Street site, between Forbes and Fifth avenues. The $238 million tower to be known as 350 Fifth would have space suitable for an “anchor tenant” in its 772,000 square feet of space, Oxford officials said. “We are pleased to announce 350 Fifth, and the redevelopment of the strategic property that stretches the block between Fifth and Forbes,” CEO Steve Guy said. “The project will be selected and active development started by the last quarter of 2012. That ‘s a firm commitment today.” The current building would be demolished if Oxford decides to build the high-rise, which would feature upscale retail and office space. Leases at the building are being allowed to expire, so that Oxford can take control of the structure, the company said. If it’s renovated, at a cost of $40 million, the building would feature open floor plans and a rooftop deck, along with a redesign of the retail space with outdoor seating. The building could become one of three new towers that soon will rise in the Golden Triangle. The Tower at PNC Plaza, a $400 million, 33-story “green building” is under way at Woods Street and Forbes Avenue and should be completed by mid-2015. Plus, construction should start later this year on the Gardens at Market Square, a $77 million, 17-story complex of hotel, office and retail space along Forbes Avenue. The 350 Fifth project would be Oxford Development’s second project to add to Downtown’s skyline, having built One Oxford Centre on Grant Street.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.