ShareThis Page
Philadelphia lawyer to lead Center for Sustainable Shale Development |
Local Stories

Philadelphia lawyer to lead Center for Sustainable Shale Development

Timothy Puko
| Tuesday, January 21, 2014 12:01 a.m

A Philadelphia lawyer who has worked for the energy industry and the Environmental Protection Agency will become the executive director of the Center for Sustainable Shale Development.

Susan P. LeGros, whose appointment is expected to be announced on Tuesday, will be tasked with maintaining harmony among the coalition of environmental groups and drilling companies that have pledged to work together to improve environmental standards for natural gas drilling.

“I’ve always tried to be what I call a fair broker,” LeGros told the Tribune-Review on Monday. “I’ve always tried to look at what the science tells us and figure out how that informs your policy view. I think that cuts across all the clients you represent.”

LeGros is the first full-time leader of the coalition, which was formed last year and is supported by The Heinz Endowments. She replaces Andrew Place, director of energy & environmental policy at Downtown-based EQT Corp., who has been interim executive director.

The Downtown-based center has already felt internal pressure and outside criticism in its first year. In addition to managing a complex mix of members, the center’s formation led to tension at The Heinz Endowments over the foundation’s collaboration with drillers.

One of LeGros’s first tasks is to meet with all the member groups — including The Heinz Endowments, Chevron Corp. and the Clean Air Task Force — to hear their priorities and set a strategy, she said. Then comes the center’s long-term work, to help ensure drillers work responsibly.

The center is at a pivotal time as it shifts from setting voluntary standards for responsible drilling to enforcing them among its participants. In addition to naming LeGros its first full-time leader, the center is starting to invite drilling companies to participate and prove they’re following the center’s standards for protecting water and air.

It has hired Bureau Veritas to audit those applications. And it added Irwin A. “Sonny’ Popowsky, former leader of Pennsylvania’s Office of Consumer Advocate, to a panel that signs off on Bureau Veritas’ findings, Place said.

The group is employing so many checks and balances to prove to skeptics that its member companies, including Shell, EQT and Consol, aren’t using the center for green-washing, to claim an environmentally unsafe process is safe.

“With layer upon layer of oversight, even the most skeptical person cannot say this is green lipstick,” Place said. “It’s building unassailable credibility. We hope it should be bulletproof.”

LeGros has advised chemical, battery and renewable energy companies on regulatory issues and defended them against claims of contamination, according to her current firm, Stevens & Lee. Before moving to the private sector, she was a section chief during more than four years at the Environmental Protection Agency in the mid-1970s.

The center had to find a leader who appealed to all its members, and LeGros’ work for renewable power clients was important to environmentalists, said Joe Osborne, legal director for the Garfield-based Group Against Smog and Pollution. Legros said climate change is one of today’s biggest environmental challenges and she believes her experience representing diverse interests among solar power companies shows she can unify a diverse coalition.

“A lot of the work as executive director is as a mediator between two groups of people who may not always see entirely eye to eye, sometimes, maybe more than two groups of people,” Osborne said. “It seemed like she had the ability to stake out that middle ground.”

Timothy Puko is a Trib Total Media staff writer. Reach him at 412-320-7991 or

Categories: Local stories
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.