Archive

ShareThis Page
Pittsburgh officials anxiously await transportation study results | TribLIVE.com
Local Stories

Pittsburgh officials anxiously await transportation study results

ptrsmarter022413
Traffic flows down Penn Avenue in East Liberty on Tuesday, Dec. A CMU-created robotic traffic signal system is used at nine intersections in the neighborhood, with the signals sending one another information about traffic flow. Andrew Russell | Tribune-Review
ptrsmarter02022413
Traffic flows down Penn Avenue in East Liberty, Tuesday, Dec. 18, 2012. A CMU-created robotic traffic signal system is used in the neighborhood. Andrew Russell | Tribune-Review

Pittsburgh officials expect good things at minimal cost from a transportation study by technology giant IBM.

Six IBM experts from across the globe spent three weeks in Pittsburgh last year, scrutinizing transportation systems, and will provide the city a detailed report of their findings and recommendations early this year.

IBM provided the expertise, valued at $400,000, for free as part of its Smarter Cities Challenge grant program.

No one is sure what IBM might recommend.

The company offered a hint in October with preliminary findings that suggested expanding things such as robotic traffic lights in East Liberty and the Port Authority of Allegheny County’s smart-card system for paying fares on buses and light-rail transit.

“What they’re saying is, ‘You guys are actually advanced, because you’ve got a smart-card program, but here’s a lot of things you can do to improve that smart-card system,’ ” said Stan Caldwell, deputy executive director of Carnegie Mellon University’s Traffic 21 program and T-Set University Transportation Centers.

He said IBM might suggest that city officials work more closely with universities to develop high-tech transportation ideas, such as the traffic signal system that Carnegie Mellon developed for East Liberty.

Traffic signals at nine intersections give information on vehicle flow. The systems automatically change to red or green lights, to better manage the flow.

Caldwell said the system reduced wait times 40 percent at lights and cut vehicle emissions by 21 percent.

Todd Reidbord, president of Shadyside development company Walnut Capital, which developed the former Nabisco plant in Larimer into a high-tech center called Bakery Square, said his tenants are looking for alternative transportation programs. He said it would be easy and inexpensive to start a bike-share program, placing bicycles around the city for commuters to use.

“Their recommendations will help guide us to smarter decisions in the future,” Mayor Luke Ravenstahl said of the IBM study. “What excites me the most is (that) they’re not going to come back with recommendations for things that need significant amounts of funding.”

Bob Bauder is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-765-2312 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.