ShareThis Page
Post-Gazette warns union members of possible layoffs |
Local Stories

Post-Gazette warns union members of possible layoffs

Chris Fleisher
| Tuesday, March 1, 2016 11:00 p.m

The Pittsburgh-Post Gazette has warned its union that newsroom layoffs could be coming by the end of the month.

The company, owned by Toledo-based Block Communications Inc., sent a formal notice to the News­paper Guild of Pittsburgh about the potential for cuts late last month, guild President Mike Fuoco said.

“As a formality, the company sent us a letter, as required by contract, toward the end of last month, giving us a required 30-day notice that there could be layoffs,” Fuoco wrote in an email. “Simply put, this means that contractually there could be layoffs, but not necessarily that there will be.”

It’s uncertain how many jobs are at stake. No number was given in the letter to the union, which Fuoco said was “pro forma.”

Attempts to reach Post-Gazette general manager Lisa Hurm and marketing director Tracey DeAngelo by phone and email were unsuccessful.

The warning follows a round of voluntary buyouts that the guild said were offered to 120 editorial employees last summer. It is unclear how many workers accepted that offer, but the goal was up to 21.

The guild represents 157 newsroom reporters, photographers, copy editors, artists and other staffers at the Post-Gazette.

If the company follows through on its warning, it would be the first time in Fuoco’s 32 years at the Post-Gazette that union employees were affected by layoffs, he said.

Twice before, in 2010 and 2008, the union received the same warning and the company did not follow through, he said.

“My hope is that record will remain unblemished,” Fuoco said.

Chris Fleisher is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-320-7854.

Categories: Local stories
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.