Rosebud takes over former Amfire mines in Pennsylvania |
Local Stories

Rosebud takes over former Amfire mines in Pennsylvania

Rosebud Mining Co. has begun operating 10 mines it bought from Amfire Mining Co., a subsidiary of Alpha Natural Resources, in a sale completed Tuesday.

The $86 million deal includes 10 mines and four preparation plants and railcar loading facilities in Cambria, Centre, Clearfield, Elk, Greene, Indiana and Somerset counties.

Rosebud, based in Kittanning, said it will rehire 137 of 412 workers laid off by Alpha.

Lower prices and lower demand for coal makes for a volatile market. But the purchase made sense for Rosebud because it operates several mines in the region, said Jim Barker, vice president.

“Their assets integrate well with ours and (have) the same geographic footprint,” he said. “Consolidation is generally pretty normal in down times.”

Rosebud mines about 7 million tons of coal per year and operates 18 mines in Pennsylvania and four in Ohio, according to its website.

Geography was a key driver for Virginia-based Alpha to sell the mines, company spokesman Steve Hawkins said.

“Rosebud is a very good regional operator,” he said. “Because of their location, it was easier for them to ship coal than for Amfire to ship coal. Amfire was not a core asset of Alpha, so it made good business sense to sell.”

The company struggled with financial losses this year and cut production, jobs and expenses in recent years. Alpha operates Emerald and Cumberland mines near Waynesburg but said in August that it will close Emerald, which employees 500, in the second half of 2015.

The company laid off 193 workers at two West Virginia mines this year.

Katelyn Ferral is a Trib Total Media staff writer. Reach her at 412-380-5627 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.