UK watchdog fines BNY Mellon $186 million |
Local Stories

UK watchdog fines BNY Mellon $186 million

Bank of New York Mellon was fined $186 million by a British regulator for failing to keep clients’ money safe during a six-year period, the second time in a month the bank was penalized for misdeeds during the financial crisis.

The bank said no clients lost any money as a result of what the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority said was a failure to “record, reconcile and protect safe custody assets.” BNY Mellon also didn’t take the proper steps to prevent these assets from being mixed up with other accounts, the regulator said.

The penalty, issued a month after BNY Mellon settled a major fraud case with the Justice Department, underscores the increased regulatory scrutiny of large banks since the financial crisis and could hurt BNY Mellon’s reputation.

The fine, levied on BNY Mellon’s London Branch and BNY Mellon International Limited, settles an investigation into the bank’s practices between November 2007 and August 2013, Georgina Philippou, the FCA’s acting director of enforcement and market oversight, said in a statement. The world’s largest custody bank, BNY Mellon safeguards financial assets for clients, including large institutions, and Philippou said the bank’s failure to properly protect those customers posed a serious threat to the financial system.

“Had (BNY Mellon’s subsidiaries) become insolvent, the total value of safe custody assets at risk would have been significant,” Philippou said. “This is compounded by the fact that the breaches took place at a time when there was considerable stress in the market.”

The London Branch and BNY Mellon International Limited are the third and eighth largest custody banks, respectively, in the United Kingdom, according to the FCA. They provide custody services to a total of 6,089 British clients, and the balances held by those firms combined were more than $2.2 trillion during the period under investigation.

The fine from the FCA doesn’t threaten significant financial harm to BNY Mellon but highlights a serious and embarrassing issue that the bank would need to address, said Erin Davis, a senior analyst at Morningstar.

“It’s a serious neglect of their duties,” she said.

BNY Mellon said it implemented new policies and operational procedures to address the issues after conducting its own internal review. The penalty from the FCA would be fully covered by pre-existing legal reserves, the bank said.

“BNY Mellon is very mindful of the importance of safeguarding client assets and has been trusted by its clients to do so for 230 years,” the bank said in a statement. “This trust could not have been earned without robust regulatory compliance in all of our operating jurisdictions, and we regret in this case that we did not meet our standards or those of the FCA.”

The fine was levied a month after BNY Mellon said it would pay $714 million to settle a fraud case with the Justice Department and New York authorities. That case alleged that the bank overcharged pension funds and other clients in foreign currency transactions.

Chris Fleisher is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7854 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.