Winners announced in Green Workplace Challenge |
Local Stories

Winners announced in Green Workplace Challenge

A friendly environmental competition among 50 Western Pennsylvania companies, nonprofits and other organizations resulted in $1.5 million in energy savings and 436 fewer tons of waste heading to landfills over the past year, organizers said.

The Green Workplace Challenge, which wrapped up its third installment with an awards ceremony at the Andy Warhol Museum Wednesday evening, encouraged participants to reduce energy and water use, cut pollution and get more employees involved in environmentally friendly work. Participants earned points in the yearlong competition by taking certain steps, such as putting in bike racks, conducting energy audits or installing more efficient office equipment.

“If you do one thing and repeat it many, many times, it starts to have an impact,” said Matthew Mehalik, program director for Downtown nonprofit Sustainable Pittsburgh, which has organized the event since 2011.

Sustainability efforts such as those highlighted in the challenge help attract younger, more engaged people to the region, said Allegheny County Executive Rich Fitzgerald, whose office was honored as the top waste reducer. The Carnegie Museums of Pittsburgh took top honors for reducing energy and water use.

Overall award winners in different size categories included:

• Business: Pashek Associates (micro), evolveEA (small), The Mall at Robinson (medium), and Highmark (large)

• Nonprofit: Group Against Smog and Pollution (micro), GTECH (small), and Carnegie Museums (medium)

• University: University of Pittsburgh

• Government: Monaca (small) and Allegheny County (large)

David Conti is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-388-5802 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.