Uber sinks deeper into trade-secret theft allegations |

Uber sinks deeper into trade-secret theft allegations

The Associated Press

SAN FRANCISCO — A top Uber lawyer struggled to explain to a federal judge why the company reached a $7.5 million settlement with a former employee who accused it of stealing its rivals' trade secrets, even though Uber considered the allegations a bogus attempt at blackmail.

The effort did little to clear up the latest dark cloud hanging over the ride-hailing service. Uber is struggling to defend itself in a high-profile lawsuit alleging that it has been building a fleet of self-driving cars with technology stolen from Waymo, a Google spinoff.

The trial in that case was set to begin next week, but U.S. District Judge William Alsup postponed it until February 5 after learning about a 37-page letter sent to Uber lawyer Angela Padilla by a former Uber security manager and his lawyer. The letter included accusations of intellectual thievery and other shady behavior that have reshaped the Waymo case.

Although the May 5 letter included allegations that Uber had stolen some of Waymo's trade secrets, Padilla didn't share it with any of the lawyers involved in the case. That has incensed Alsup, who maintains that the letter is a key piece of evidence, even though its allegations remain unproven.

“On the surface, it looked like you covered this up,” Alsup scolded Padilla. “For reasons that, to me, are somehow inexplicable.”

Padilla testified in a Wednesday court hearing that she sent the letter to the U.S. Justice Department in an attempt to deflate the “extortionist” claims of Richard Jacobs, who was Uber's manager of global intelligence until seven months ago. Jacobs' allegations are now part of a Justice Department investigation into whether Uber has been breaking U.S. laws as it emerged as the world's leading ride-hailing service.

Despite Uber's belief that Jacobs simply was making up a story in an attempt to milk the company, it paid $4.5 million to Jacobs and $3 million to Clayton Halunen, the Minneapolis lawyer who wrote the explosive letter. Jacobs' chunk of the money includes a one-year stint as a Uber consultant that will pay him $1 million through August.

That settlement prompted a Waymo lawyer to ask Padilla: “Does Uber pay money to extortionists?” Padilla responded, “We try not to.”

The revelation about the Jacobs settlement probably couldn't come at a worse time for Uber, which has already been trying to clean up the damage done in a corporate culture that fostered rampant sexual harassment , technology used to dupe regulators and a yearlong cover-up of a hacking attack that heisted the personal information of 57 million riders and 600,000 drivers.

Uber paid a $100,000 ransom to keep the hacking attack under wraps, a tactic that has irked several U.S. lawmakers and that now threatens to get the company into more legal trouble.

During her testimony, Padilla said Uber reluctantly paid Jacobs and Halunen to avoid distractions, protect the safety of overseas employees and avoid the costs of a lawsuit. The explanation didn't seem to persuade Alsup, who will be presiding over the jury trial.

“People don't pay that kind of money for BS and they certainly don't hire them as consultants,” the judge said.

Alsup also lashed out at the $3 million paid to Jacobs' lawyer, Halunen, calling it “unconscionable.” Contacted Wednesday, Halunen said he routinely works on a contingency basis that requires him to be paid 40 percent of the total settlement. “Whether it's $1 or $10 million, I get 40 percent,” Halunen told The Associated Press.

Halunen is likely to be called as a witness in the Waymo trial. Jacobs testified Tuesday that an allegation made in the letter — that Uber tried to steal Waymo's trade secrets — was incorrect.

Jacobs also alleged that Uber that tried to conceal its misconduct by routinely using a messaging service called Wickr that erases conversations shortly after they are sent. Although it denies most of Jacobs' claims, Uber has acknowledged its employees used Wickr for company business. Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi disclosed in a Wednesday tweet that he ordered workers to stop using Wickr and other vanishing messages services while on the job in late September, shortly after he replaced company co-founder Travis Kalanick.

Before ending Wednesday's hearing, Alsup warned Uber that the task of defending itself against Waymo's allegations is becoming more difficult.

“Poor Uber, I don't feel sorry for you because you brought this on yourself,” Alsup said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.