Peer-to-peer apps come with risks, FTC warns |

Peer-to-peer apps come with risks, FTC warns


A high-tech solution to the perennial problem of the friend who never has cash when it comes time to pay for the pizza, peer-to-peer payment systems like Venmo, Square Cash or Google Wallet also can create new problems, according to the Federal Trade Commission.

One is that money may not actually transfer when the app says it does. PayPal Inc., the parent company of Venmo, has agreed to settle an FTC case that included complaints that Venmo would tell customers that money had been credited to their accounts and was available for transfer to an external bank account.

In reality, the company didn’t review the transaction until a customer tried to transfer the money and that could lead to a delay or rejection of their attempt to put the money into a bank account so they could pay rent or other bills.

That delay in verification raises a related issue of scammers appearing to pay for items without sending any money. If you’re accepting a P2P payment for tickets or other merchandise, transfer the payment to a bank account and make sure it clears before shipping anything.

Because a P2P app needs to access your financial information, check to see what security measures it offers and make sure they’re turned on.

Some P2P apps post transaction on social media. If you’re not wild about the whole world knowing how you spend your money, check the app’s social media settings before you use it. The FTC has some other suggestions about securing your personal information.

Brian Bowling is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-850-1218, [email protected] or via Twitter @TribBrian.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.