JPMorgan hires top AI researcher from Carnegie Mellon University |

JPMorgan hires top AI researcher from Carnegie Mellon University

Aaron Aupperlee
Justin Merriman | Tribune-Review
Carnegie Mellon University professor Manuela Veloso shows Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton around the school's robotics lab on Wednesday, April 6, 2016.

Wall Street’s largest bank has hired one of Carnegie Mellon University’s top researchers in artificial intelligence.

Manuela Veloso, who leads CMU’s Machine Learning Department, will head artificial intelligence research at JPMorgan.

Veloso will take a leave of absence from CMU starting July 1 to work in a newly created position at the bank.

JPMorgan already has teams built to explore and implement artificial intelligence and machine learning , according to the Wall Street Journal. The bank used an AI program known as LOXM in 2017 to execute trades more efficiently. The program learns from billions of past trades.

JPMorgan told employees about hiring Veloso in an internal memo sent Thursday.

Veloso will look to expand JPMorgan’s use of AI in ways that could transform financial services, according to a statement from CMU. The bank could collaborate with universities and other research institutions.

Banks and financial institutions have taken a serious look at using artificial intelligence to improve efficiency, enhance the customer experience, speed up loan approvals, crack down on fraud and make smarter trades and other financial decisions. JPMorgan has a tech budget of $10.8 billion for 2018 and $5 billion set aside for new investments, according to CNN.

Veloso earned her Ph.D. from CMU and became a professor in the Computer Science Department in 1992. She led CMU’s robot soccer team and showed that robots and humans could work together with her CoBot project.

Aaron Aupperlee is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at [email protected], 412-336-8448 or via Twitter @tinynotebook.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.