Pennsylvania joins other states in suing to stop net neutrality rollback |

Pennsylvania joins other states in suing to stop net neutrality rollback

Aaron Aupperlee
Dan Speicher | Tribune-Review
Attorney General Josh Shapiro, talks to the Tribune-Review editorial board, at their office in Greensburg, on Wednesday, April 26, 2017.

Pennsylvania has joined several other states in a lawsuit to block the federal rollback of net neutrality regulations.

The lawsuit, signed by the attorneys general of 21 states and the District of Columbia, was filed Tuesday in the U.S. Court of Appeals in Washington.

“The vote by the Federal Communications Commission last month to gut net neutrality threatens to end the internet as we know it,” Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro said in a statement. “The FCC’s action undermines free speech and is bad for consumers and business—especially startups and small businesses. I filed this lawsuit today with my colleagues to stop this rollback from being implemented.”

The FCC voted in December to undo a series of Obama-era rules that guaranteed equal access to the internet. Proponents of net neutrality fear that without those regulations internet service providers will be able to block content and slow or speed-up service. FCC Chairman Ajit Pai has said the internet will still thrive without the rules, which he called heavy government regulation.

The lawsuit asks the court to find the FCC’s Restoring Internet Freedom order, the order rolling back net neutrality, “arbitrary, capricious, and an abuse of discretion.” The states asked the court to find the order unlawful and to vacate, enjoin and set aside the order.

Pennsylvania was joined by New York, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Mississippi, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, and the District of Columbia.

Aaron Aupperlee is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at [email protected], 412-336-8448 or via Twitter @tinynotebook.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.