ShareThis Page
Pittsburgh teen finalist in Snapchat’s #MyFutureMe contest |

Pittsburgh teen finalist in Snapchat’s #MyFutureMe contest

Aaron Aupperlee
| Friday, November 10, 2017 11:51 a.m
Anna Nesbitt, 14, of Regent Square is a finalist in Snapchat’s #MyFutureMe contest.
Anna, 14, of Regent Square went to the TEDWomen conference in New Orleans as a finalist in Snapchat’s #MyFutureMe contest.

Like most teens, Anna Nesbitt uses Snapchat every day.

She has long streaks of messages back and forth with her friends, quick photos and videos snapped throughout the day with text, stickers, flower crowns, dancing hot dogs, face-swaps and more.

“It’s my main communication with my friends,” Nesbitt said of Snapchat.

But unlike most teens, Anna’s work on Snapchat has won her national attention and inspired her to make a better future.

Anna, 14, of Regent Square, a student at Winchester Thurston and member of the Girls of Steel Robotics team, is a finalist in Snapchat’s #MyFutureMe contest. Her entry was one of five selected out of more than 22,000 submissions.

“Woah, what?” Anna said was her response upon hearing the news. “That’s amazing.”

Snap, the parent company of Snapchat, partnered with Google’s Made with Code program for the #MyFutureMe contest. It challenged teen girls to design a geofilter that reflected their image of the future. A geofilter is a border or graphic that Snapchat will add to posts based on a user’s location. Geofilters around Pittsburgh’s Downtown feature bridges while ones at PNC Park are baseball-themed.

The five finalists flew to New Orleans at the beginning of the month to attend the TEDWomen conference and meet with tech luminaries, entrepreneurs, artists and activists. The finalists worked with Google engineers and designed a Snapchat lens, an augmented reality feature that places a drawing in the real-world photo taken on a phone.

Anna’s geofilter combined her love of robotics, her hope for technology and her belief in the power of ideas. The geofilter features a lightbulb in the upper left corner, a circuit board design around the edges and the text “This is just the beginning,” in the lower right corner.

“To show that my future is just beginning,” Anna said.

Anna also wrote a 100-word essay to accompany her geofilter explaining her vision of the future. In it, Anna described a future where everyone has equal access to robotics and technology.

“When everyone has access to these things, we begin to see our similarities,” Anna said.

Those similarities quickly crowd out our differences, she said, and we come to see ourselves as one people, not as contentious groups.

It’s a future Anna is already working toward. Through Girls of Steel, Anna works at summer camps focused on robotics for younger children and mentors teams of elementary students. She’s working with third-graders now and building Lego robots.

Last summer, Anna helped run a summer camp designed for girls who hadn’t seen or interacted with a robot before. The girls came from disadvantaged neighborhoods where schools and families didn’t have the means to access robotic technology.

That same summer, Anna went to Washington with Girls of Steel to advocate for more funding for science, technology, education and math in schools.

When Anna entered the #MyFutureMe challenge, she certainly didn’t expect to win. It was a way to put off doing homework she didn’t want to do. She also didn’t expect it to change her life in the way that it has.

While in New Orleans, Anna met Justin Baldoni, an actor on one of her favorite TV shows but also someone she admires for advocating for feminism and redefining masculinity. She also met Avery Bang, a young woman building footbridges in developing countries to connect people. Anna said she thought she could do with robotics what Bang does with footbridges.

That would be her long-term goal, Anna had thought.

“That’s changed,” Anna said. “Why am I waiting? Why am I not taking the initiative now?”

The grand prize in the #MyFutureMe contest includes an all-expenses-paid trip to California to tour the offices of Google and Snapchat and meet with the leaders of the companies. The winner’s lens will be made available on Snapchat.

As a finalist, Anna got to expand upon her original 100-word essay describing her vision of the future. She finished it and submitted it this week. In it, she connects her dreams to what she’s doing now. The distance between the two isn’t as far as it once was, Anna said.

Anna hopes to hear if she won by Thanksgiving.

Aaron Aupperlee is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at, 412-336-8448 or via Twitter @tinynotebook.

Aaron Aupperlee is a Tribune-Review staff reporter. You can contact Aaron at 412-320-7986, or via Twitter .

Categories: Technology
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.