Baldacci’s ‘Escape’ brings fast, furious twists and turns |

Baldacci’s ‘Escape’ brings fast, furious twists and turns

One of the most compelling characters in David Baldacci’s thrillers is John Puller, a crackerjack investigator of military crimes. In “The Forgotten” and “Zero Day,” readers learned that Puller has an older brother, Robert, who is serving a life sentence for treason. In “The Escape,” Baldacci reveals the reason for Robert’s imprisonment.

The story begins on a stormy night in Kansas. There’s a major power failure at Robert’s maximum security prison. The computer-controlled cell doors unlock and inmates come pouring out into the darkness. Robert escapes, leaving an unidentified dead man in his cell.

Robert’s disappearance unnerves authorities because he’s an expert in nuclear weaponry and cybersecurity. They ask Puller to find his brother and return him to prison.

As he works to accomplish this mission, Puller discovers the U.S. intelligence community is full of its own spies — and those working for its enemies.

Twists and turns come fast and furious in the best Baldacci tradition.

“The Escape” is much more than a thriller. It’s a moving tale of two military brothers and their father, a retired Army general and fighting legend now suffering from dementia.

Emotionally intense, “The Escape” is Baldacci’s best to date.

Waka Tsunoda is a staff writer for the Associated Press.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.