ShareThis Page
David Bowie interview collection shows the man behind the legend |

David Bowie interview collection shows the man behind the legend

'David Bowie: The Last Interview and Other Conversations' by David Bowie, Melville House (208 pages, $16.99)

The introduction of “David Bowie: The Last Interview and Other Conversations” begins: “David Bowie gave a lot of interviews until he didn’t.”

Quirky, well-spoken and charming, the iconic music legend who died of cancer in January 2016 at age 69 left behind a trove of inspiration. But fans looking for in-depth discussions about Bowie’s musical process will be disappointed by this collection of 10 interviews spanning 1964 to 2006.

Instead, the wide-ranging interests of Bowie the person are highlighted: film, style, fashion and art. The book is the latest installment in Melville House’s Last Interview series, chronicling the final words of such illuminating lives as James Baldwin, Jane Jacobs and Kurt Vonnegut.

It starts with an interview in 1964, with a 16-year-old David Jones (he would become David Bowie about two years later) representing a group called the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Long-Haired Men. The giggle-filled chat on the BBC’s “Tonight” was focused, most fittingly, on the length of his hair. It had been three years since Bowie had had it cut.

In a story titled “David Bowie Tells All and More,” Bowie paints a portrait of an artist unashamed of himself and his family. “The majority of the people in my family have been in some kind of mental institution,” he tells Patrick Salvo of Interview in 1973.

The most confounding interview is the conversation Bowie had with writer William Burroughs. These two kindred spirits had only recently become acquainted with the other’s work.

They had a deep conversation about honesty (“I usually don’t agree with what I say very much,” Bowie says), the state of writing songs (“Songwriting as an art is a bit archaic now. Just writing a song is not good enough”), Bowie’s audience (“I’m quite certain that the audience that I’ve got for my stuff don’t listen to the lyrics”), film (“I don’t believe in proper cinema; it doesn’t have the strength of television”), sound (“I wonder if there is a sound that can put things back together”), before Bowie proclaims “maybe we are the Rogers and Hammerstein of the Seventies, Bill!”

Then there is a 13-year gap from 1974 to 1987, which yields two solid conversations, one being the pinnacle of the book: the 1987 Kurt Loder interview for Rolling Stone.

It includes the tidbit that Bowie “works out and roller skates in his spare time.” One can imagine a 40-year-old Thin White Duke roller-skating down the street.

And Loder asks, “Is it true that when Ziggy and the Spiders played Santa Monica on the first tour, the band went off to a Scientology meeting and got converted?” Of course it is.

The conversation touches on film, which Bowie had grown more interested in, before delving into Bowie’s listening habits in the mid-1980s, which is a nice trip down memory lane.

The final time Bowie does a formal interview in this collection, in 1992, features the infamous question about what he kept in his fridge in 1975.

Bowie stopped touring and giving interviews after a heart attack onstage in 2004, although he did do a gag interview in 2006 for Ricky Gervais’ show “Extras,” the last entry in this book. But he didn’t stop recording and releasing albums. The last, “Blackstar,” came two days before his passing and was a sort of self-interview. The album recently earned four Grammy nominations, for best rock performance, rock song, alternative music album and engineered album, non-classical.

Bowie believed that he could say the things he wanted to say with his music, which remained true until his death.

As the number of interviews decreased, the importance of each word increased. Those words still remain the most important part of who David Bowie was. So long David Jones, we miss you dearly.

Jon Kaleugheris a Kansas City Star staff reporter.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.