Archive

ShareThis Page
Review: ‘Full Measure’ is realistic on every level | TribLIVE.com
Books

Review: ‘Full Measure’ is realistic on every level

Tribune-Review
| Saturday, November 8, 2014 5:03 p.m.
BookReviewFullMeasureJPEG03c07
This book cover image released by St. Martin's Press shows 'Full Measure,' by T. Jefferson Parker.

T. Jefferson Parker, known for his crime novels, delivers an emotional and gut-wrenching literary departure that’s miles away from what his fans and readers would expect in “Full Measure.”

Patrick Norris returns home after a military tour in Afghanistan. He has been forever changed by the horrors he faced, the people he was forced to kill and the friends he watched die. Patrick is happy to see his family and start a small sport-fishing business. But an arsonist has destroyed the majority of the trees on his parents’ avocado farm. They’re close to financial ruin, and they ask Patrick for help, which forces him to put aside his dreams.

The challenge to rebuild the business, along with secrets that threaten to tear the family apart, takes away the hope he had when he first returned. Patrick has left the battlefield of Afghanistan to enter another war, this time on the home front.

Parker captures the experience of what it means for a soldier to return home. The economic struggle of Patrick’s family showcases the plight of the working farmer. The family dynamic and the elements of small-town life are also in abundance.

Parker has a gift for storytelling, and “Full Measure” is realistic on every level.

Jeff Ayers is a staff writer for the Associated Press.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.