ShareThis Page
Review: Stephanie Evanovich delivers heartfelt romance in ‘Total Package’ |

Review: Stephanie Evanovich delivers heartfelt romance in ‘Total Package’

Liz Hayes And Jody Weigand
| Saturday, March 26, 2016 5:18 p.m

Stephanie Evanovich delivers another swoon-worthy romance with “The Total Package.” She reunites the heroine of her story with her long-lost love in the most unlikely of settings — a football field.

Dani Carr is an aspiring sports journalist with big dreams of becoming a television analyst. She’ll stop at nothing to prove that a woman is capable of doing the job well. She’s sacrificed a lot to get this far in her career, and a job with the Austin Mavericks may be the break she needs to make it into the big time.

Dani never expected her world to come crashing down when her first true love, Tyson Palmer, doesn’t recognize her when he joins the team as the new star quarterback. Palmer, a first-round draft pick, was a winning quarterback, heartthrob — and painkiller addict. He was kicked off his team and hauled off to rehab. Fortunately, the Mavericks see beyond the drugs and take a chance on Palmer to lead them to the Super Bowl.

All he has to do is remain focused.

Although pills are no longer a distraction, Dani may be a problem. After a few days of working together, Tyson finally realizes that the smart, sexy woman in the front office is the girl who had a crush on him in college. He has no idea why she insists that they keep their relationship professional.

“The Total Package” is a will-they-or-won’t-they love story set in the exciting world of NFL football. Evanovich weaves a story that spans over a decade, chronicling the challenges of young love. Readers will root for the quarterback who deserves a second chance and cheer for the journalist trying to claw her way to the top.

Will Tyson win the game and the girl?

Lincee Ray is an Associated Press writer.

Categories: Books
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.