Archive

ShareThis Page
Woman caught in viral video dipping chicken tenders in soda: It’s a little weird | TribLIVE.com
Food & Drink

Woman caught in viral video dipping chicken tenders in soda: It’s a little weird

Tribune-Review
| Wednesday, September 5, 2018 11:03 a.m
198817ptrVideoChickenSoda090618

So this happened at the U.S. Open on Monday: ESPN cameras caught a woman dunking her chicken tenders into a soda.

Here’s the clip, shared to Twitter by the sports network :

The woman was identified as Alexa Greenfield and she was at the tennis event with her nephews. She spoke to several media outlets after the clip went viral to explain her eating habits.

Greenfield told TMZ that she’s been dunking her tenders in ice cold Coca-Cola since she was young. It’s something her dad taught her as a way to cool the food down.

She shared with Sports Illustrated that it always has to be Coke, not Diet Coke or other soda. But then she doesn’t drink the soda because it gets too greasy from the dunking.

SI posted a whole Q&A with Greenfield about the dunking.

And she shared with FOX 5 in New York City that people are saying (jokingly, we hope) that she should go to jail . She said saw kidding with her nephews and that she said it’s a little weird but don’t tell anyone. And then the cameras caught her.

After the clip went viral many folks posted to Twitter critiquing the dunking …

Frank Carnevale is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Frank at 412-380-8511, fcarnevale@tribweb.com or via Twitter @frnkstar.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.