ShareThis Page
Banished Brutalism: Death knells abound for building style |
More Lifestyles

Banished Brutalism: Death knells abound for building style

| Saturday, May 27, 2017 9:00 p.m
Jasmine Goldband
Posvar Hall at the University of Pittsburgh is an example of Brutalist architecture on college campuses. Jasmine Goldband | Tribune-Review
Jasmine Goldband
Posvar Hall at the University of Pittsburgh is an example of Brutalist architecture on college campuses. Jasmine Goldband | Tribune-Review

When an exposed concrete subway vault near the U.S. Capitol was painted white this spring, riders rejoiced at the brightened Washington Metro station. But some preservationists were unhappy, complaining that a “cardinal rule” of the Brutalist style was broken.

Brutalism, which got its name from a French word for raw concrete, has been sparking public battles ever since the architectural style flourished in the 1960s and 1970s, spawning buildings from Boston to Belgrade.

Now, the era’s aging structures are being declared eyesores and slated for demolition in cities around the world. Or, as in Washington’s Union Station, their austere features have been softened.

Gallery Place-Chinatown Metro station in Washington.

Associated Press



The public’s eagerness to get rid of Brutalist buildings has made their life expectancy short, compared with some older architectural styles. Structures headed for imminent demolition include an office building in York, England. A church in Atlanta was razed this spring, and the McKeldin Fountain near Baltimore’s Inner Harbor disappeared this year. Structural problems can also hasten their death. Earthquake concerns in the San Francisco Bay Area doomed architect Mario Ciampi’s landmark Berkeley Art Museum, which remains vacant and has been replaced with a new museum nearby.


The John E. Fogarty Building, a former government building in the Brutalist architectural style, in the middle stages of demolition in Providence, R.I.

Associated Press


For all the Brutalist buildings that go down without a fight, a few get a loving farewell. In downtown Providence, R.I., kazoo-playing mourners recently held a funeral procession and gave eulogies as demolition crews prepared to tear down the John E. Fogarty Building, built as a government welfare office in the 1960s.

“It’s not an easy style to like,” said Marisa Angell Brown, an architectural historian at nearby Brown University who attended the funeral and co-wrote a mock obituary for the 49-year-old building. “We tend to prefer boring to ugly.”

She said the “preservation community here didn’t put up a huge fight to save it,” but she will miss the building, especially if it’s replaced by a bland hotel. The owner of an Irish pub across the street disagrees. Murphy’s bar proprietor Ruth Ferrazzano said its grim look would be more fitting in Soviet Russia.


Not everyone thinks the Brutalist style is ugly. In Sydney, Australia, tenants of a public housing high-rise overlooking the harbor and the city’s opera house have been fighting to protect the terraced building by getting it listed on a historical registry. A chain-link fence was erected as both sides await a court ruling that could decide what happens next.

“True Brutalism is at once elegant and sexy,” wrote a columnist defending the building in The Sydney Morning Herald last year. “It’s a style that esteems strength and raw honesty, but especially as juxtaposed against the delicacy of glass, the sway and spike of nature, the play of light.”


The FBI headquarters in Washington, D.C.

Photo from


It’s not an accident that Brutalist buildings are often public, from D.C.’s forbidding FBI headquarters, which is likely fated for demolition, to housing complexes in Europe and college campuses, city halls and county administration offices throughout the United States.

“A lot of them were sort of left-leaning, very progressive and interested in creating a new style that was in opposition to the high modernism that you saw on Park Avenue,” Angell Brown said. “There was a feeling among these architects that government was a positive force in people’s eyes. These were democratic institutions that would kind of lead the way in progressive ideals.”


There’s hope for some Brutalist buildings, including a vacant office tower designed by famous architect Marcel Breuer that looms over Interstate 95 in New Haven, Conn.

The millions of motorists who have driven past the former tire company headquarters over the past decade know it mostly as a canvas for furniture giant Ikea, which ties a huge banner ad from its roof to advertise chairs or desks sold at its adjacent store. But now Ikea, which owns the property, is allowing artists to use the building as a pop-up exhibit this summer and is entertaining proposals from developers who want to creatively refurbish the building.

“It can redefine the imagination of the city and maybe the whole New York region,” said Matthew Nemerson, New Haven’s economic development administrator. He added that it was built with “good-quality concrete.”

Matt O’Brien is an Associated Press writer.

Categories: More Lifestyles
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.