ShareThis Page
Hax: As mother begins full-time job, she longs for lost time at home with son |
More Lifestyles

Hax: As mother begins full-time job, she longs for lost time at home with son

Carolyn Hax
| Friday, December 4, 2015 8:57 p.m

Dear Carolyn:

I got divorced and had to start working full time after five years of working part time or staying home with my son. I am having a really hard time coping.

I miss having time to play with my son, I miss having a clean house, I miss having more time with my pets. I am overwhelmed and have so much less time for the things that matter to me.

Logically, I know I have to work full time. I am my family’s sole support now. But I hate it. I cry when I think of the field trips I won’t be able to volunteer on, the sports games and practices I will have to miss, and all the other things most working moms don’t have time for.

I wanted to be my son’s primary caregiver, and now I will never have that. I see his childhood slipping away, and it breaks my heart. What can I do?

— Going Back to Work

Um. You can be careful what you say and around whom you say it, and not only because you just wrote the above to a mother who works full time and rarely misses her kids’ games and performances and who is in the stands with plenty of other working parents.

Be careful, because suggesting that “primary caregiver” and “full-time employee” are mutually exclusive and that parents who work are doomed to watch their kids’ childhoods “slip away,” comes across as judgmental.

You are your son’s parent. He lives in your home. You are primary.

A substantial benefit to adjusting your thinking on this — besides not alienating the parents who can sympathize and serve as carpoolers-in-arms — is freeing up angst space for the difficulties you face that aren’t exaggerations. It is a huge adjustment for you. Being the sole breadwinner is a heavy responsibility. You will have to make some compromises. You miss your boy.

Even these, however, hardly add up to motherhood lost. I suggest treating them instead as a rather rude but perfectly endurable reordering of your priorities.

For example: You want play time with child and pets? Of course. Good choices both. That means you tolerate a messier home. If mess drives you nuts, then designate an out-of-sight stash zone you use daily, and schedule a focused hour or two a week to clear out the stash.

If preparing dinner costs too much play time, then embrace slow-cooker living. If laundry overwhelms, then price a service; sometimes it’s cheap enough to justify farming it out.

Glean more ideas from those other parents you now won’t offend, or conjure some of your own as your learning curve flattens, as surely it will.

If you have to miss some games, practices or field trips, then pick which means most to him (and you) and don’t belabor the rest. (Practices! Ha. Worth watching only to get a read on the coach.)

Missing a thing or two, or assigning him a chore or two, is not a calamity; on the contrary. Paired with your obvious love and good intentions, hearing “no” occasionally could be good for him, an inoculation against a sense of entitlement — which, as it happens, might be the most off-putting trait there is.

Email Carolyn at, and follow her on Facebook at

Carolyn Hax is a Tribune-Review freelancer. You can contact Carolyn at

Categories: More Lifestyles
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.