Hax: Avaricious bride-to-be howls over ‘stingy’ co-workers’ wedding gifts |
More Lifestyles

Hax: Avaricious bride-to-be howls over ‘stingy’ co-workers’ wedding gifts

Carolyn Hax

Adapted from a recent online discussion:

Dear Carolyn:

A co-worker of mine is getting married and invited me to her wedding. I sent what I thought was a nice gift off her registry that cost about $60. We are in the same role at our office and make approximately the same amount of money (and are fairly well compensated). However, my husband is out of work, and we have a hefty mortgage payment, a young child, and another on the way, so my financial situation is not as rosy as my salary might make it appear.

My co-worker has been loudly complaining that people in our office are not getting her “nice” gifts and that she feels many people are being stingy. She went so far as to say that she expects them to give her another gift at the actual wedding.

This felt like a jab at me, and I’m not sure how to handle it. Just ignore? Explainmy situation? Give something else? I didn’t think I was being stingy, but I also am not eager to hurt what was otherwise a positive professional relationship.

— Buy Another Wedding Gift?

The wolves who raised this woman must be so proud.

Ignore her. If you weren’t yoked together at an office, I’d advise the great friendship (or acquaintanceship) rethink.

Because you are colleagues, I suggest sticking to whatever your original plan was for the wedding. You intended the gift as her wedding gift, so you’re done; no bonus gift is necessary. If you were planning to go to the wedding, then go, and if you weren’t, then don’t. As I said, change nothing about your plans, as if her ugly, greedy sentiments were never expressed.

They were, of course, and you will have to keep them in mind outside the context of the wedding.

I don’t think it’s an overreaction to view her now as someone you can’t trust. She revealed her character with her appalling complaint, and the news is grim. Keep things pleasant and positive, but know the asterisk is there.

You also probably want to give some thought to your reflexive impulse to offer yourself up as wolf food. This isn’t about 60 bucks; it’s about who runs your life. You, not the tantrum-thrower du jour, are the one who decides how you spend your money, effort and time.

Re: Wedding gift:

Carolyn, that’s a terrible insult to all wolves.

In my experience, $60 is extremely generous for a gift from a co-worker, unless (s)he is a friend outside of work, also — not just the occasional weekday lunch, but socializing on evenings and weekends, too.

If this were my colleague, my poor Aunt Suzanne would fall and break her hip, and no other caretaker could be available, sadly, on the exact date of the wedding, so I’d have no choice but to visit to care for her that weekend.

— Anonymous

You’re right. I owe an apology to wolves. I learned a lot today, and I will work toward redeeming myself in the eyes of the wolf community, which has been unwavering in its support of this column.

Email Carolyn at [email protected], and follow her on Facebook at

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.