ShareThis Page
Hax: Pick your battles with mother-in-law |
More Lifestyles

Hax: Pick your battles with mother-in-law

Carolyn Hax
| Thursday, November 14, 2013 5:49 p.m

Good Morning, Carolyn:

I’m hoping my debacle makes it to your column because I desperately need advice!

Each year, my mother-in-law sends out a ridiculously braggy and self-righteous holiday “letter” updating her friends and extended family members. She recently sent a group text to my husband, his sister and me asking for our favorite pictures from the year to include in her Christmas letter.

My issue isn’t that she ignores the concept that our favorite picture would be used for our own purposes, it’s that she insists on having us be a part of this letter.

I plan to call her and say that although I’m thankful for her thinking of us, we will again be sending out our own holiday card and do not need to be explicitly included in hers.

Background: My mother-in-law tends to be selfish. One brief, childish example, of which there are many — she demanded her husband wear a white tux to our wedding. The only men wearing white at our ceremony were members of the military that were involved in performing the traditional sword arch. She staged this argument the week before the wedding, ignoring that my husband and I were deliberate in asking our fathers to wear traditional black tuxes.

Is it possible that we should just roll over?

— Adults Treated as Children

When you tell me that a photo request for Ma’s Christmas newsletter is a “debacle,” this is how I want to respond:

Famine. Human trafficking. Syria. Hello?

But the examples you give of outrageous behavior from your mother-in-law are so trivial, they throw your judgment into question right along with your mother-in-law’s. Her pushing back on your black tuxedo request, for example. That was childish of her, certainly, but consider the worst case: The wedding doesn’t happen? Nope. You suffer lasting emotional scars? Nope.

As for the holiday letter, I could spend days trying to figure out why the content in her Christmas letter and your grown-up holiday card has to be mutually exclusive, and why her request for your “favorite” picture can’t be satisfied with your second- or fifth- or 19th-favorite shot from this past year.

But while that sounds delightful, I’ll pass, because it’s beside the point. You aren’t looking to present legitimate arguments against your mother-in-law, you’re looking to present any argument against your mother-in-law.

Please trade that for a strategy of sorting. Imagine a giant wheely trash bin — label it “Ridiculous.” Imagine an old-school desktop in-box — label it “Real.” From now on, you’re putting everything your mother-in-law throws at you into one of these. White tux? Ridiculous. (Thump.) Wants a photo for her insufferable annual brag rag? Ridiculous. “Here. It’s of all of us on St. Crispin’s Day.” (Hook shot! Thump.) Um … I’m going to have to make something up here … her trying to dictate how you live, love, worship, spend money, raise kids or schedule your time? Real — inbox. (Swish.) That’s when adults “assert ourselves as adults.”

Email Carolyn Hax at

Carolyn Hax is a Tribune-Review freelancer. You can contact Carolyn at

Categories: More Lifestyles
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.