ShareThis Page
Hax: Pregnant sister is off her rocker over alleged chair-breaking incident |
More Lifestyles

Hax: Pregnant sister is off her rocker over alleged chair-breaking incident

Carolyn Hax
| Thursday, March 5, 2015 6:21 p.m

Dear Carolyn:

My sister “Rhonda” is about to give birth to her third child. She already has 2- and 4-year-olds, and I have a 1-year-old. During most of this pregnancy, my sister has acted almost as though she hates me. Sometimes when our family is together and I start talking, she will suddenly leave the room. She is increasingly argumentative with me, taking offense with me over seemingly innocuous conversation. It leaves me feeling crazy.

I have repeatedly asked my mom and my sister-in-law if they know why she is being so hostile with me, and I kept getting the, “Well, her hormones might be out of whack,” etc. I continued to insist it must be something else, because I am the only person she treats this way.

My sister-in-law finally confessed that Rhonda is angry with me because she believes I broke her rocking chair when we visited their home. I have no recollection of breaking the chair, unless I did it sleepwalking. I do not know why she thinks it was me, and not my husband, whom she continues to regard fondly. My husband does not recall the chair breaking, either.

My mother and sister-in-law told me I am not allowed to ask Rhonda about the incident or I will be breaking Rhonda’s confidence. So, I can’t really apologize, or make it right, or buy her a new chair. What is this?

— In Crazy Town?

It’s apparently irrational, possibly hormonal and definitely a huge fail by your mother and sister-in-law.

When someone chooses to mistreat another for a specific, undeclared, crazy, petty reason, as Rhonda is mistreating you, informed bystanders have a duty to step in, especially when they’re family. “Rhonda, you are being openly unkind to your sister without even telling her why, much less giving her a chance to make amends. Either you talk to her, or I will. You have a week.”

It felt good just typing that. There are plenty of confidences we’re bound to keep, but allowing nasty, secret grudges to poison a family is not part of any duty to remain discreet. Witnesses have power in these situations that they often don’t use for fear of meddling (or fear of Rhondas). There always has been an exception to no-meddling rules in the event of cruelty, though, and shutting someone out for unexplained grievances is just that, cruel.

So, enlist your mother’s help … a month or four after the baby’s born, because a little oxytocin might put Rhonda back on the rails.

This isn’t to say that only rainbows and glitter await if your mother (or sister-in-law) intercedes. On the contrary. Rhonda could easily turn on your defenders — and blame you for that, too, because she no doubt feels her actions are righteous and just. Or, she could acquiesce on the Great Rocking Chair Calamity of 2014 only to turn on you for something else manufactured to take its place. People are less likely to second-guess passionate feelings than they are to justify them in arrears. If she’s got it in for you, expect her to keep it.

Still — when a family stands up not for one member or another, but for civility within its ranks, that’s its only real chance to stay on its rocker for good.

Email Carolyn at, and follow her on Facebook at

Carolyn Hax is a Tribune-Review freelancer. You can contact Carolyn at

Categories: More Lifestyles
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.