Archive

ShareThis Page
Husband tells white lie to get out of visiting his mom on Mother’s Day | TribLIVE.com
More Lifestyles

Husband tells white lie to get out of visiting his mom on Mother’s Day

Carolyn Hax
| Thursday, May 31, 2018 8:35 p.m
gtrLIVhax

Hi, Carolyn:

My husband asked me how I want to celebrate Mother’s Day with our baby, and I suggested the three of us go to brunch Saturday so we could leave Sunday open to celebrate our own mothers. He agreed to that, but then I overheard him telling his mom on the phone that he will be busy with me all day on Sunday (not true).

My mother-in-law is a very sweet person and a very giving, generous mother, but her two adult sons find her tiresome because her interests are fairly provincial and her conversation gets repetitive. She lives 10 miles away, yet my husband rarely makes time to see her.

This isn’t the example I want set for our son — one of the main reasons it was so important that we prioritize his grandmothers on Mother’s Day. Yet I can’t really force my husband to see his mom if he doesn’t want to. At the very least, I don’t want to be a party to his lie. Any suggestions?

— Mother

You can’t force him to see his mom, but you can see her yourself, I suggest regularly, and bring the baby to nurture their bond.

And you can break the odd and unhelpful silence between you and your husband on this.

“This” being not just brunch plans from a bygone Sunday, but the big, important ideas of family and forgiveness and honesty and example-setting. And of course communication, since you and I are the ones talking where he’s only been overheard.

So start with that: “I heard you tell your mom you were busy on Mother’s Day. I was confused — I thought we’d agreed to see her. Did something change?”

The phrasing here is deliberate in avoiding any kind of accusation, because defensiveness is an intimacy killer and the whole point here isn’t to start a fight or avoid one, but to get to the truth. You also don’t yet know the whole story; maybe there’s a reasonable explanation that didn’t occur to you.

If the answer is just aversion to seeing his mom, then you can touch on your preference that he just tell you so upfront — and then focus on the example-twofer it sets to lie your way out of elder visits. Certainly he can envision a future where you two become the drab oldsters to your someday grown son, yes? Even if you’re scintillating company, the first time one of you gets sick, you’ll hardly count to 10 before wishing you’d taught your boy to show up.

Depending on how this part of the conversation goes, you can then bring up your discomfort with his saying one thing to you and another to his mom, and/or with the pressure that devolves to you when he opts — unilaterally — for the white-lie method of social avoidance.

We’re now … let’s see, 1-2-3-4 layers into our dissection and haven’t even gotten to the forgiveness part, where we recognize it’s OK to give the “very sweet” and “very giving, generous” people who raised us a pass on getting a little repetitive with age.

And that in turn says there’s a risk of piling on in this talk with your husband. If your instincts say, “choose your battles,” choose honest communication; that’s groundwork for any- or everything else.

Email Carolyn at tellme@washpost.com, follow her on Facebook at www.facebook.com/carolyn.hax or chat with her online at noon Eastern time each Friday at www.washingtonpost.com.

Carolyn Hax is a Tribune-Review freelancer. You can contact Carolyn at tellme@washpost.com.

Categories: More Lifestyles
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.