Martial artists kick their way through research fundraiser |
More Lifestyles

Martial artists kick their way through research fundraiser

Mary Pickels
Madden McKeever, 5, kicks his way through the recent Pittsburgh Institute for Neurodegenerative Diseases 5K ‘kick-a-thon’ challenge on Sept. 3.

In an effort to help “kick” Parkinson’s Disease, more than 100 martial artists from the Viola Karate Dojo and sister program Norwin Ninjas kicked for one mile non-stop through Boyce Park on Sept. 3.

In addition to showcasing their skills through the Kick-A-Thon, participants raised and donated over $10,000 to aid 5K event host Pittsburgh Institute for Neurodegnerative Diseases research efforts, according to a news release.

Bill Viola Jr., founder of Kumite Classic Entertainment, and former state Sen. Sean Logan developed the “Kick” concept.

”Last year the ‘Kick’ raised just over $5,000 with 50 participants. This year we doubled both, bringing us up to over $15,000 with just two kicks-a-thons,” Viola says in the release.

The estimated amount of kicks thrown by each participant was 1,500 and with over 100 students, the total number was approximately 150,000 kicks, he adds.

Leading students included Mike Barone, 9, with $2,015; Aidan Thornton, 11, $900; and Madden McKeever, 5, $800, Viola says.

PIND spearheads efforts to find a cure for Parkinson’s Disease, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS), Huntington’s Disease, stroke, and Alzheimer’s Disease.


Mary Pickels is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Mary at 724-836-5401, [email protected] or via Twitter @MaryPickels.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.