ShareThis Page
‘Pelican Dreams’ strikes gold with big birds |

‘Pelican Dreams’ strikes gold with big birds

Pelican Media
A white pelican strolls in St. James Park, London, in 'Pelican Dreams.'

As documentarian Judy Irving did with “The Wild Parrots of Telegraph Hill,” her 2003 sleeper hit that remains among the 50 highest-grossing theatrical documentaries of all time, she has again found storytelling gold in a quirky avian-news item.

Inspired by 2008 news reports of a weak and sickly pelican found wandering, disoriented, amid traffic on the Golden Gate Bridge, the filmmaker’s “Pelican Dreams” follows Gigi (as Irving names the bird) into the Bay Area nature-rehabilitation facility where she has been bundled, under a blanket, in the back seat of a police car.

It is a slender-but-charming film, moving and educational in equal measure as Irving digresses from Gigi’s tale to look into the larger story of pelicans, whose survival has been threatened by climate change, oil spills, pesticides and competition for food with human fishermen. Along the way, the filmmaker, who also acts as narrator, introduces us to a second pelican, Morro, who is simultaneously recuperating from a wing injury in the back yard of a couple who looks after several other wounded birds.

We are made to care, not just about these two funny-looking feathered creatures — whose personalities are likened, aptly, to those of dogs, by Gigi’s chief caretaker, Monte Merrick — but about the species in general. It’s a nature film with a very personal entry point. Two, really. The fate of these birds, who, the film tells us, could live into their 40s, becomes as engrossing as many a human drama.

Irving is a good storyteller, shaping the narrative around handsome National Geographic-style cinematography, as well as more-mundane footage of the day-to-day business of wildlife rehabilitation.

Her narration, at times, involves a bit of hyperbole. Irving tells us, near the beginning of the film, that she knows what flying feels like because she regularly dreams about it. Later, she quotes an avian veterinarian who has assured her — on what evidence, it is not clear — that pelicans also dream.

Both of these statements may be true, but they aren’t the ones that matter. Those truths have to do with how our actions affect the other beings with whom we share this planet.

Michael O’Sullivan is a staff writer for The Washington Post.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.