Archive

ShareThis Page
Review: ‘The Hobbit’ bows out with a slow-footed bang | TribLIVE.com
Movies/TV

Review: ‘The Hobbit’ bows out with a slow-footed bang

Reuters
| Tuesday, December 16, 2014 9:00 p.m
FilmReviewTheHobbitTheBattleoftheFiveArmiesJPEG07669
Martin Freeman stars in 'The Hobbit The Battle of the Five Armies.'
FilmReviewTheHobbitTheBattleoftheFiveArmiesJPEG04ca7
In this image released by Warner Bros. Pictures, Luke Evans appears in a scene from 'The Hobbit The Battle of the Five Armies.' (AP Photo/Warner Bros. Pictures, Mark Pokorny)
FilmReviewTheHobbitTheBattleoftheFiveArmiesJPEG036f8
In this image released by Warner Bros. Pictures, Cate Blanchett and Ian McKellen appear in a scene from 'The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies.' (AP Photo/Warner Bros. Pictures)
FilmReviewTheHobbitTheBattleoftheFiveArmiesJPEG076e5
In this image released by Warner Bros. Pictures, Orlando Bloom, left, and Evangeline Lilly appear in a scene from 'The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies.' (AP Photo/Warner Bros. Pictures, Mark Pokorny)

Peter Jackson’s “The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies,” sends this not-really-a-trilogy off in style. That means stuffing in everything the fans want, or that Jackson thinks the fans want.

So, “Battle” is bookended by two epic fights — the duel to the death with the dragon Smaug, and the “Five Armies” finale. There is death and destruction, forbidden love and treasure, honor and slaughter.

And Jackson, who has messed with this adaptation even more than he did “Lord of the Rings,” hedges his bets. His invented love story between the elvish Tauriel (Evangeline Lilly) and the dwarf Kili (Aidan Turner) still doesn’t work. So, he brings in Cate Blanchett, Hugo Weaving, Orlando Bloom and Christopher Lee, reprising their characters from “Rings,” as a way to anticipate the Middle-earth epic that follows.

We get sentimental moments with most characters, often in the middle of the pitched battle that is the climax of this film, curtain calls to engender warm memories from the faithful.

And we’re treated to a trio of stunning special-effects set pieces. The first is Smaug’s fire-breathing assault on Lake-town, torched to the water-line before the hero Bard (Luke Evans) can fell the beast. Then, there’s a struggle to save the ever-imprisoned Gandalf (Ian McKellen), one that involves a battle with the ghosts of warriors past.

Finally, there’s a sword fight on the ice, a grim and drawn-out clash between a monstrous orc and Thorin Oakenshield (Richard Armitage), the greedy and increasingly paranoid King under the Lonely Mountain.

“Five Armies” is funnier than the other Hobbit movies, with zingers from the cowardly ruler of Lake-town (Stephen Fry) and sight gags that often involve some hapless orc being killed in a creative way.

“The Hobbit” has never overcome the handicaps of its plot and casting. Jackson made some of the dwarves characters Snow White would adore, and others look like hirsute alumni of heavy-metal bands. None of them popped off the screen the way the players did in “Lord of the Rings.” The one classic hero here is Bard, the dragon slayer, and he has too little to do.

As hobbit Bilbo Baggins, Martin Freeman, the marvelous Dr. Watson on TV’s “Sherlock,” never seems proportionally right as a “halfling,” not the way Elijah Wood did in the “Rings” cycle.

It’s the best film of this trilogy, but truthfully, none of the “Hobbits” has been better than middling “Hunger Games” or “Harry Potter” installments.

Roger Moore reviews movies for Tribune News Service.

Categories: Movies TV
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.