ShareThis Page
‘Killer Heels’ exhibit exceeds expectations |
Art & Museums

‘Killer Heels’ exhibit exceeds expectations

| Friday, September 23, 2016 12:15 p.m
Stephanie Strasburg | Tribune-Review
Shoes from the collection of Adelaide Howard Childs Frick and Helen Clay Frick on display in the Grable Visitor Center at The Frick Art Museum in Point Breeze on Thursday, June 2, 2016. Pictured are J. & J. Slater slippers from 1905 made of silk satin and silk embroidery.

The first exhibit in the Frick Pittsburgh’s new series on the intersection of fashion, design and fine art was a breakout hit. “Killer Heels: The Art of the High-Heeled Shoe” was seen by more than 24,000 people during its 12-week run, the most for any Frick exhibition in a decade, according to the museum.

The show ran from June 11 through Sept. 4 and exceeded the Point Breeze museum’s projections for both revenue and attendance.

The museum put the show’s popularity to good use by partnering with Dress for Success. More than 150 pairs of “gently worn” women’s shoes were donated by Frick visitors during the shoe drive on Aug. 13.

The show was the first in a three-year series of fashion-focused exhibitions, which is supported by a $1 million grant from the Richard King Mellon Foundation.

The museum is preparing its next fashion exhibition, “Undressed: A Brief History of Underwear” from the Victoria and Albert Museum in London. It will run from Oct. 21 through Jan. 14, 2017. The Frick is the only North American venue for the show, which reflects society’s changing attitudes toward the body, morality and sex.

Categories: Museums
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.