Fans want Mac Miller’s ‘Party on Fifth Ave.’ to be Penguins new goal song |

Fans want Mac Miller’s ‘Party on Fifth Ave.’ to be Penguins new goal song

Jack Fordyce | Tribune-Review
There's a petition on asking the Pittsburgh Penguins to change their goal song to rapper Mac Miller's 'Party on Fifth Ave.' as a tribute to the Pittsburgh native who died on Sept. 7. Here, Miller performs in 2016 at Stage AE in Pittsburgh.

Tributes continue to pour in for Mac Miller, the rapper and Pittsburgh native found dead in his California home on Sept. 7.

Following a Sept. 11 vigil in Squirrel Hill’s Blue Slide Park, a favorite Miller hangout immortalized in his debut 2011 album of the same name, comes news of a petition on for the Pittsburgh Penguins to change their 2018-19 goal song to Miller’s “Party on Fifth Ave.”

Petitioner “B John” says, “I think it would be a fitting tribute to the rapper to change the goal song to the upbeat song he created. Party on Fifth Ave is a song by Mac Miller and PPG Paints Arena is located on 5th Avenue in Pittsburgh.”

Haven’t heard it? Here’s a link to a clean edit of the song (which presumably the Penguins would use if they agree to the change — or maybe they’d stick to the funky horn intro):

As usual, the Twitterverse has opinions, positive and negative and somewhere in between. Here is what users are saying:

Let’s go for it:

Let’s make it a one-time tribute:

And finally, though results of Miller’s autopsy are still forthcoming, let’s pause to consider what kind of a statement would be made, considering that Miller had a well-publicized struggle with drug addiction.

On Sept. 12, TMZ reported that Miller’s body was en route to his hometown for a funeral.

Shirley McMarlin is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 724-836-5750, [email protected] or via Twitter @shirley_trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.