ShareThis Page
Response to Fringe festival good so far; applications still being taken |
Theater & Arts

Response to Fringe festival good so far; applications still being taken

| Tuesday, December 10, 2013 9:00 p.m

Some 30 theater companies and performers already have applied for a slot in Pittsburgh Fringe, the area’s first fringe festival.

That’s already more than co-founders Daniel Stiker and Xela Batchelder need for their quota of 20 events to fill the 60 performance slots next year in the festival that will run May 2 to 4 and 9 to 11 at multiple venues on and around Ellsworth Avenue in Shadyside.

Modeling Pittsburgh Fringe after established festivals in cities such as Edinburgh, Scotland, and New York City, Stiker and Batchelder hope to provide a platform for the area’s emerging theater artists and widen audience awareness of mid-size theater companies.

“I want people to be aware there are places where companies on the fringe of established theater can be seen,” Stiker says. “The impetus is to help middle-ground theaters.”

The theater groups he’s thinking of are companies such as Off the Wall Theatre in Carnegie and 12 Peers Theatre, which performs at Pittsburgh Playwrights Theatre, Downtown. These companies have a professional approach to performing but are either starting out or not widely known.

The deadline to apply for a festival slot is Jan. 1.

Although one or two groups might be chosen in advance, most of the festival participants will be chosen the evening of Jan. 16, from 6 to 8 p.m., when the un-juried names are drawn at random.

“This gives brand-new people a chance as well as (those more established),” Stiker says. “It’s exciting and scary at the same time.”

Details about the festival and how to apply for a slot can be found at

Alice T. Carter is the theater critic for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-320-7808 or

Categories: Theater Arts
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.