The hidden story of Brooks Brothers has a home in Virginia |

The hidden story of Brooks Brothers has a home in Virginia

The venerable men’s clothier Brooks Brothers has been a fixture in New York since being founded there in 1818. But, it can be argued that the beating heart of the company resides some 20 miles west of Washington, in an industrial park in Chantilly, Va. That’s where the official Brooks Brothers historical archive resides in soothingly dim light and 68 degrees Fahrenheit, plus or minus two degrees.

The repository of Brooksiana, shall we call it, owes its richness and its existence to two men. The first, Donald C. Vaughan, was the company’s director of advertising from 1915 to 1948. He kept files of Brooks newspaper advertisements, brochures and historical photos. He even collected novels and other books that mention the company, which made and sold ready-to-wear work clothes for the mining expeditions of the 1849 California Gold Rush, uniforms for Union soldiers in the Civil War and made the custom-tailored overcoat Abraham Lincoln was wearing when he was assassinated.

“It’s fair to say we have every piece of paper that mentions Brooks Brothers,” says Kelly Stuart, a lively young woman who bears the rather cumbersome title of director, brand training and development, but who fairly gushes Brooks history and lore (“I’m a history junkie, and this is the most powerful crack there is,” she says).

The other Brooks archive “enabler,” and the reason the archive is in the Washington area, is Bruce Weindruch, co-founder of D.C.’s History Factory, a company created in 1979 to compile and/or manage historical archives for corporations and other organizations.

Being “a lifelong, devoted” Brooks customer, Weindruch approached Brooks in 1982 and was invited to visit the Manhattan “attic” where some historical materials were being collected and stored, not necessarily in organized fashion. Six years later, Weindruch and company were assembling the company’s heritage in an archivally responsible way.

For its first 125 years or so, Brooks was a stable company, passing down from the original brothers. The clothier passed out of the family’s hands in 1946, when Henry Sands Brooks’ great-great-grandson, Winthrop Holley Brooks, sold the firm to Julius Garfinckel and Co. of Washington, D.C. As the decades passed, the clothier was sold again, to Allied Stores (1981), then to British retailer Marks and Spencer (1988).

Retail turmoil in the 1980s and ’90s made the maintenance of an archive just about the last consideration for the company’s embattled owners. Soon, Weindruch was maintaining the collection at his own expense, out of belief in the brand and its place in history (introducing button-down shirts, madras fabrics, Harris tweed and argyle socks to the American public).

Then came 2001 and new owner Claudio Del Vecchio, who took the company private. The Italian billionaire, a Brooks enthusiast and a lover of its history, thanked the History Factory for preserving the archive, to which Weindruch responded, “No thanks necessary: You’re the guy I’ve been waiting for!” With a stroke of Del Vecchio’s pen (on a bank check), the decade-long back rent and expenses of the archive were satisfied and the collection set firmly on a new footing.

The collection continues to grow. “When you sell clothing,” Kelly Stuart says, “you don’t necessarily think of your clothes as part of your ‘archive,’ but they are.” With that in mind, the company sees looking back into its rich history as a brilliant way to move forward.

Nancy McKeon is managing editor of and a contributing writer for The Washington Post.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.