Simple seafood stew can be adapted to cook’s preference |
Food & Drink

Simple seafood stew can be adapted to cook’s preference

Cioppino is an Italian-American seafood stew that most likely originated on fishing boats as a one-pot meal that fishermen would cook up from the catch of the day.

That’s probably why I like it so much. It is so easy, you could literally pull it together on a tiny boat, with little equipment or attentiveness required.

Yet, despite its humble simplicity, a bowl of cioppino is gloriously alluring and impressive looking, with chunks of fresh fish and shellfish piled in a tomato-rich broth fragrant with garlic, herbs and aromatic vegetables.

It is one of those dishes you can play with, depending on your preferences and the ingredients you have on hand. Instead of the onion, celery and sweet red bell pepper I use in the accompanying recipe, for example, you could use shallots, leeks, fennel and-or sweet green bell pepper.

You don’t have to be exact about the proportions of tomato and broth. Make it as thickly tomato-y as you like by adding more tomato paste or additional chopped tomatoes, or, hold back on them a bit to make it more broth-y.

Most important, because the dish was born to celebrate seafood, choose the fish or shellfish that looks best at the market the day you plan to serve it. Just about any type will work.

On the table in less than an hour, cioppino is perfect for weeknights. But it is also ideal for serving to guests, because you can make the soup base in advance and refrigerate or freeze it.

Then, all you need to do is bring it back to barely bubbling and add the fish right before you are ready to eat. Serve it with a hunk of crusty bread, as I am certain the Italian fishermen did.

Cookbook author and registered nutritionist Ellie Krieger is a contributing writer for The Washington Post. She blogs and offers a weekly newsletter at

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.