A second chance for the guy who chose another woman over her? |
More Lifestyles

A second chance for the guy who chose another woman over her?

Carolyn Hax

Adapted from a recent online discussion.

Hi, Carolyn:

Here’s my story. About a year ago, I went on a few dates with “Daniel.” I had a great time and was interested in what might come of it, but after those initial few dates, he started to fade away: He took longer to answer calls and texts, conspicuously left town right before Valentine’s Day, became markedly less flirty when we did talk. I chalked it up to loss of interest and was unsurprised when I stopped hearing from him altogether.

About a month later, he got in touch with me to let me know he felt bad about ghosting me, and that he had done so because things had gotten serious with someone else he had started dating around the same time, “Kate.” At this point, he was happily in a relationship with her, and said he wished me well.

Last week, he reached out to me on Facebook wanting to talk about [something involving a mutual interest of ours], and we met for coffee — not a date, in my understanding. There, I found out that he has since broken up with Kate. He didn’t immediately ask me out on an actual date, but he did so last night — and now I owe him a response.

On the one hand, I still really like this guy as a person; all the things that attracted me to him last year are still true, and I’m still single. On the other hand, it stings that — oversimplification alert — something about Kate caused him to choose her over me when we had both begun dating him at the same time.

I’m not sure what to make of that, especially given that they didn’t last. Was she really the better choice for him, or not? And if she was, does it make any sense for me to date him now, and maybe lose him again, to the next Kate who comes along? Or am I just thinking about this all wrong?

— To Reconnect or Not to Reconnect?

Sounds as if you’re thinking about this all right. “[S]omething about Kate caused him to choose her over me when we had both begun dating him at the same time.”

Yes! Absolutely. Sounds like a great puzzle for him to help you solve. Go on the date and ask him.

There are so many possibilities that would be neutral for you, or even promising. Like, maybe Kate insisted he date her exclusively or not at all, and he figured exclusively was worth a try, even though all things being equal he’d rather have kept getting to know you both. Or, maybe Kate presented herself as one thing, which he found particularly attractive, and turned out to be a fairly off-putting other. Maybe Kate’s charms are superficial and yours reveal themselves fully only over time.

Maybe after the initial wowees, most of his time with Kate was spent thinking about you.

Not to feed you any false hopes or anything. But it’s possible. It’s also possible you’ll just “lose him again, to the next Kate who comes along.”

I say be open about it. Nothing to lose, really.

And if you feel like it, let us know how it goes.

Email Carolyn at [email protected], follow her on Facebook at or chat with her online at noon Eastern time each Friday at

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.